User talk:MadamXMedia111

Welcome, and a question

Welcome. Are you in any way affiliated with Bobby Castro? Or is he just someone you like? If you are paid for your edits, you must disclose this fact somewhere prominent, ideally on your user page (User:MadamXMedia111). Thanks! Ovinus (talk) 01:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peace & Salutations of Grace! Hello Ovinus, thank you for your message. Intend to update my user page, thank you! MadamXMedia111 (talk) 01:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Paid creations must be put through a process called "Articles for Creation" (WP:AfC), where they will be more scrutinized. I will draftify the article, allowing you to work on it in "draft space". You can find it here: Draft:Bobby Castro.

Keep in mind: Wikipedia values neutrality, and you should avoid puffery or praise. It will likely get your article declined or even deleted. If you find yourself using words like "award-winning" or "solutions", then you're probably writing inappropriately. Write dispassionately—pretend you don't even know the guy. Also, make sure that all of your sources are independent of Castro. Thanks. Ovinus (talk) 01:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the term "award-winning" does not appear in the article, for the record.
at no time did I disclose that I have been paid (as of Sept 30, 2022)
in fact, I have dedicated my time and professional efforts towards the previous entry of sustainable contributions over subjects of public interest with cultural and historical value for the simple fact of being fact
Thank you for your advise and guidance
Let us come together and Love for Love is the Reason for the Season

MadamXMedia111 (talk) 02:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, apologies for misinterpreting your reply. I didn't realize that you weren't a paid contributor. Please let me know if you need any help or advice. Ovinus (talk) 02:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Helo @Ovinus ... I am grateful for your warm, thoughtful and respectful welcome. GRATITUDE!

Being that you asked, would you please take a look at the duplicate Bobby Casto pages and please assist in rightfully getting t down to the one with all the citations , and can you please review it for just publication? That would be most apprecateed ... incredibly ... And, if i can offer you my assistance in the fultrue, please let me know and consider it done! Peace , Love & Light MadamXMedia111 (talk) 06:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bobby Castro has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bobby Castro. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:08, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's so good of you RM, will check it out. thank you! MadamXMedia111 (talk) 21:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holland Park Avenue (Toronto)

Hello, MadamXMedia111

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username VickKiang, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Holland Park Avenue (Toronto), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 03:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To all Wikipedia Wikipedians Jimmy Wales @JimmyWales @LarrySanger, et al, Fact is Fact Truth is Truth Record should rightfully reflect all LIFE MATTERS Holland Park Avenue is a real roadway ... it is, in fact, a lane which many families call home and have called home for generations. how does this fact bring up any questioning as Holland Park Avenue being "suitable for inclusion"? Question posed to @VickKiang if Holland Park Avenue was a place your family lived ... your mother ... your grandmother ... your grandmother's grandmother ... for generations, would you question it's qualification for "inclusion"? MadamXMedia111 (talk) 17:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC) I see something and I'm saying something about it.[reply]

Rev. Dr. Sean H. McMillian moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rev. Dr. Sean H. McMillian, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

gratitude MadamXMedia111 (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Fox Soul

added a link pointing to Black culture

James DuBose

added a link pointing to Black culture

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gratitude MadamXMedia111 (talk) 19:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MadamXMedia111. Thank you for creating Bobby Castro. User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

More and better sources are required, as many sources are press releases and sponsored posts.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pyrrho the Skipper Peace and Salutations. Please review Bobby Castro article and kindly advise over the following notification:

Nomination of Bobby Castro for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Bobby Castro

is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to

Wikipedia's policies and guidelines

or whether it should be

deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Castro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

... discospinster _talk 18:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply][reply]

@Discospinster Respectfully and Rightfully, @Discospinster Please 1. identify yourself, 2. State your intent and 3. provide a detailed list of inarguable reason for your move to enter this "Nomination of Bobby Castro for deletion". Because of your action, you are now holding the responsibility of the said request, period. MadamXMedia111 (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bobby Castro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bobby Castro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Castro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

... discospinster _talk 18:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Discospinster Respectfully and Rightfully, @Discospinster Please 1. identify yourself, 2. State your intent and 3. provide a detailed list of inarguable reason for your move to enter this "Nomination of Bobby Castro for deletion". Because of your action, you are now holding the responsibility of the said request, period. MadamXMedia111 (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been adjusted accordingly, with gratitude. To all Wikipedia Wikipedians Jimmy Wales @JimmyWales @LarrySanger, et al, with respect my witnessing of the recent "judgements" entered over 1. Questions over the relevancy of a page and 2. the outright removal of evidence-supported material to a political page (proof of the editor presenting their intent as being anything but "Neutral), one cannot deny the rightful documentation of a person's LIFE WORKS for we are all here on earth for a purpose. To deny the documentation of one's LIFE WORKS, in my humble opinion, is nothing more than "whitewashing", for the record. FACT IS FACT . TRUTH IS TRUTH. History is the collective documentation of FACTUAL TRUTHS. As a conscious human being, a journalist who views the role of documentation as being a great responsibility, I stand firmly behind this logical notion of inarguable reason, respectfully. MadamXMedia111 (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To all Wikipedia Wikipedians Jimmy Wales @JimmyWales @LarrySanger, et al, @Discospinster @Discospinster @Pyrrho the Skipper @JimmyWales This is an essential platform. It is a highly respected platform. It is an honor and privilege to serve the role of contributor to this platform. I motion that we as contributor reconsider nit-picking over irrelevant questioning (ie whether or not the factual works of one Robert Castro should or should not be documented: a real person whose life works (substantial life works, matter), that energy would be better spent on the recent, obvious biased editorial action 2022 Toronto Mayoral Election, a page which should rightfully reflect a democratic electorial process involving 30 Mayoral candidates, one of whom will hopefully be voted in in a fair, just, democratic manner ... for the purpose of serving the people of Toronto ... a city that is failing to address a homeless epidemic (I, personally, can speak to that being one who was homeless for nearly five months during the year 2021 in Toronto, my birthplace), a city that is ridden with gun violence, a city that lacks affordable housing, a city that lacks affordable groceriers to support a vegan diet (I personally can attest to that) ... alll of these are NOT ONLY ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS ... CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS & FREEDOMS ,, THEY ARE UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS ... perhaps we should consider the weight of importance of our duty to document that which is fact, that which are LIFE MATTERS, that which is truth ... and be sure to include the WHOLE. I rest my case MadamXMedia111 (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply][reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fox Soul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black culture.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Denham Austerberry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ingenious.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hidden Empire Films

Hello MadamXMedia111,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hidden Empire Films for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hey man im josh (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobby Castro (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bobby Castro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 06:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MadamXMedia111! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 06:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sean H. McMillian

Hello, MadamXMedia111. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sean H. McMillian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bobby Castro

Hello, MadamXMedia111. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bobby Castro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bobby Castro

Hello, MadamXMedia111. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bobby Castro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]