User talk:Mackenzie O'Brien

Welcome!

Hello, Mackenzie O'Brien, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Ceramic Technology Inc., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🐍Helen🐍 20:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ceramic Technology Inc.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ceramic Technology Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🐍Helen🐍 20:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How can I improve my article?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I need advice on improving my Ceramic Technology article. What can I do to make it more neutral? Mackenzie O'Brien (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your draft, I gather that you might work for the company. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures.

Your draft had no sources. A Wikipedia article about a company should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself or what it considers to be its own history, only in what others completely unconnected with the company choose to say about it. Please read Your first article. 331dot (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May I Objectively Write About Mineral Processing?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Would writing about ceramic piping objectively be a better way to write an article about mining technology? Or is there not enough public interest in mining technology for me to do so? I appreciate your feedback; thank you for taking the time to respond! Mackenzie O'Brien (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may write about that subject if it receives significant coverage in independent reliable sources- after you make the required formal disclosures I mention above. 331dot (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do I prove I'm not a conflict of interest? I do not work for the company that I wrote the article for and I am not getting paid for the article. Is there any way for me to prove I am not a conflict of interest? Thank you for taking the time to respond; I really appreciate it! Mackenzie O'Brien (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mackenzie O'Brien: You shouldn't really need to prove anything – I assume just saying so should be plenty. CC'ing 331dot. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 13:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One cannot prove a negative, so if you have no conflict of interest, okay. I would be curious as to how you came to edit about that company. 331dot (talk) 13:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I'm a calculus student interested in mineral processing. Grew up around it and I just wanted to pay homage to the industry is all. Thank you both for taking the time to reply to me over the past few days. I'm new to Wikipedia and I really appreciate your support. Mackenzie O'Brien (talk) 13:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your clarification. 331dot (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all – I'm happy we were able to sort this out and I wish you all the best with your editing on Wikipedia. (My talk page always open if you have questions!) Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 20:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Fall 2023

Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter

Features

• A New Future for Road Articles Online

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]