User talk:MaciejKobylec

February 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Reading West railway station, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GoldMiner24 (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RAF Odiham

Thanks for contributing to the article RAF Odiham. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 11:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello, MaciejKobylec. This is a message to let you know that I have reverted this edit of yours to the Southcote Junction article. According to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, you should avoid addressing the reader using you or your (see MOS:YOU). If you have any questions, please feel free to message me on my talk page. Thank you! Friedlemon (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Churchill Way

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Churchill Way, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christchurch Green

The article Christchurch Green has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 75.108.22.67 (talk) 23:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Alton railway station. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Times in articles should always be in 24 hour clock. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]