User talk:Macglue

This account is a sockpuppet of Dewarw (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to see two SSP cases and RFCU case on Dewarw for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Macglue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked? What have I done wrong? What evidence is there that I am a "sock puppet of "Dewarw?" Please unblock immediately!

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dewarw (2nd), Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dewarw. — Yamla 17:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Macglue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How is this evidience. Please explain!

Decline reason:

[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dewarw (2nd) This] seems like strong enough evidence to me. If you want to be unblocked, please request it using your original account, not this one. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Yes, but how does this prove I am connected to User Dewaw? It is not clear. I have no idea who that User is! What do you mean original account? This is my first and only account!!!!}}

You may not delete my decline, even if you disagree with it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete the previous decline. The next time you do, this page will be protected. SQL ^{Query me!} 18:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Look! Could somebody please explain what is going on? it seems like everything I do today is vandalism. I get home and find out that I am a "sockpuppet" and have been blocked.

Could someone please explain the evidence. I have looked on the pages above and it does not make sense. I am only a new user on Wiki! Please stop threatening me with blocks. I am only requesting info! Macglue 18:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to explain. This discussion shows that you are editing the same articles as User:Dewarw, and this one shows that you are doing so from the same IP address. Therefore, the evidence suggests that you are that user, creating a new username to avoid your block. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And how does that prove that I am a "sockpuppet?" Macglue 18:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't I just answer that question? You aren't being accused of literally being a sock; a sockpuppet is an account like yours, a second account being used by a user who is pretending to be two people. "Proof" is impossible in this situation, but the evidence we have is sufficient unless new evidence comes to us. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]