User talk:Mabuska/Archive 42015/April
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mabuska. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
April 2015 GOCE newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors April 2015 Newsletter
March drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 38 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April blitz: The one-week April blitz, again targeting our long requests list, will run from April 19–25. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the requests page. Sign up here! May drive: The month-long May backlog-reduction drive, with extra credit for articles tagged in December 2013, January and February 2014 and all request articles, begins soon. Sign up now! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McCann (surname), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish and Gaelic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Death squads
Hello there Mabuska. How are you getting on?
I really think that information about the British Army from the state terrorism article also belongs in the death squad article. How can I persuade you to come around to this idea? I'm particularly interested in why you think it's suitable content for the first article, but not the second.--79.97.222.210 (talk) 09:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- The titles of the articles make it pretty obvious why. It doesn't belong to the Death Squad article. Only you really think it belongs there. You do not have any credible or academic sources that state that the British Army are a "Death Squad". The only mention of "Death Squad" in regards to the army is by one alleged former member of the MRF which on its own does not equate as academic or reliable enough for such an obvious WP:POV and WP:BIAS attempt to demonise the British Army on Wikipedia... something many of your edits quite clearly try to do.
- The MRF are an example of state terrorism so deserve mention in that article, however terrorism itself does not equate to death squads. The government could pay me to blow up empty buildings and beat people up in an attempt to terrorise the populace but that doesn't make me a death squad. Even firing at and purposely injuring people does't constitute a death squad. What the IRA, INLA, UVF, UDA and rouge army, RUC and UDR members did however when they purposely went out and murdered someone such as the Glenanne Gang did does constitute a death squad and that article makes mention of them.
- So, no, it does not belong in that article. Also thanks for taking it to talk this time. Mabuska (talk) 10:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northern Uí Néill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page McCann. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)