User talk:Maaspsychology

Welcome!

Hello, Maaspsychology, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The project page can be found at: Wikipedia:Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on your article

Hello Maaspsychology, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

Intro sentence: Why do you start with "The second edition of the book"? This only would have been done if the first edition was completely different and by another author. If you change it to "The book", it would have been good. First two paragraphs: (besides the things mentioned) excellent written!
Links: Please use more links.
Headers: I think "Specific criminal psychology" + "Relation of mental illness and crime" is one more then needed, for the rest okay.
References: More references! And more sources! The references mentioned at the bottom should have a * at the beginning of the line.
Context/timeframe: ?
How was the book received: ?
Other: Please do not abbreviate "engl".

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 08:56, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Maaspsychology, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.

Intro sentence: good!
Links: Basic keywords are still not linked, including the author, a city, criminals, etc.
Headers: Sufficient/fine. I would suggest to change "Reviews" to "Reception", and you may also try to look for a different word for "Context".
References: Sufficient for now. If you can find more sources, this would be very welcome! Those paragraphs that do not end with a reference, please add a reference there too.
Context/timeframe: Thank you for this huge improvement! The detail I miss is the direct relationship with the book from Pollitz.
How was the book received: Good!

Keep up the good work! Romaine (talk) 01:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Die Psychologie des Verbrechers – Kriminalpsychologie (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Try and get more non-Polliz sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Die Psychologie des Verbrechers – Kriminalpsychologie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 10:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maaspsychology, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 10:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Die Psychologie des Verbrechers – Kriminalpsychologie concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Die Psychologie des Verbrechers – Kriminalpsychologie, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article accepted

Hi and thank you for contributing the interesting draft of Die Psychologie des Verbrechers: I've accepted it and it's now available as an article. It seems like a wonderfully obscure book that probably strides the inclusion boundary defined by wikipedia's notability criteria, so it's possible that at some point it will get nominated for deletion (which might not necessarily result in deletion). At any rate, it's a valuable article. Thank you again for contributing it! – Uanfala (talk) 01:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]