User talk:M for Mealman

Welcome

Hello M for Mealman and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 14:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)--VViking_TalkEdits 14:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop endorsing Romanian pseudohistory. - M for Mealman

May 2022

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Konstantinos Zappas without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop endorsing Romanian pseudohistory. - M for Mealman

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jauerback: This is an obvious sock of Deucalionite, if you are unfamiliar. I would recommend extending the block to indefinite. Cutlass ^Ciera 14:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Stop endorsing Romanian pseudohistory. - M for Mealman

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M for Mealman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me or don't. Wikipedia is endorsing Romanian pseudohistory making it no better than that godawful website, Stormfront. Way to really lower the bar "geniuses". - M for Mealman

Decline reason:

WP:GAB explains how to craft an appropriate unblock request, unlike this. Yamla (talk) 16:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent editing history at Evangelos Zappas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Blue Riband► 19:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You also appear to be edit warring at Konstantinos Zappas. Blue Riband► 19:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You also appear to be endorsing Romanian pseudohistory. Stop endorsing Romanian pseudohistory. - M for Mealman

Your removal of content from Petros Zappas has also been reverted. Please discuss your disputes on the respective article talk pages and reach a consensus with other editors rather than keep reverting to what you think it should be. Blue Riband► 19:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. - M for Mealman

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 19:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What an unpredictable outcome. It could have been applied the first time. Super Ψ Dro 19:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M for Mealman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Lol. You can't build an encyclopedia by endorsing Romanian pseudohistory. What's next? Endorsing godawful Nazi propaganda? Let's hope not. - M for Mealman

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. If you don't intend to request unblock, please stop wasting both your time and ours. Your access to this page can be removed if need be. 331dot (talk) 20:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.