User talk:M Stranka

Autobiographies

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Draft:Martin Stranka. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To whom it may concern. I would like to clarify a few things in regards to Martin Stranka Wikipedia page. It is not an autobiography. I wrote the article. My name is Michala and I also wrote the Czech version of the article here:

https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Stranka

I am Mr photographer's assistant. And I think his work is worth noting. And since Martin Stranka celebrates vast success not only in the Czech Republic but also worldwide, being awarded many international awards for his works already. I believed that information and insight into his work should be available on Wikipedia in the English language as well. I hope this proves helpful and the article can be published. If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Michala zaludova.michala@gmail.com

My conclusion was drawn solely on the name of this account vs. the name of the draft article you created. Given what you have said, I withdraw my comments about the draft. However, I would ask that you please read our conflict of interest guideline. Also, if you are being paid in any manner for conducting this work, you must read and follow the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure policy. If I can help you, please let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 21:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for all your help and time. But I have not been paid in any way at all to create this page. I believe this is not a subject to Paid-contribution disclosure. Also, This is solemnly my initiative. As I have written above. I believe, that Mr Stranka's work should be available to English speakers too. For he has been exhibiting, winning major international awards and contributing with his art internationally for years now.

If there is anything further you may need to publish the page. I will provide any statement necessary. I hope this has clarified the rest of the questions and that the page can now be made public. Many thanks for your guidance and support. I appreciate it very much. Michala

Please read WP:COI. You are still related to the subject as assistant. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Martin Stranka

Hello, M Stranka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martin Stranka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Stranka (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Multiple independent and reliable sources are required. None of these appear to be independent or reliable - they all contain interview material or significant direct quotation confirming lack of independence.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Stranka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Martin Stranka, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M Stranka! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "M Stranka", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because as you have identified, you are not Martin Stranka, you cannot have this username. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 19:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Stranka (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Noahfgodard were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Stranka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Martin Stranka, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 03:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, M Stranka, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username.

If you choose to keep your current username, please send an email to info-enwikimedia.org including your real name and your Wikipedia username to receive instructions from our volunteer response team about account verification. Please do not send documentation without being requested to do so.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Martin Stranka

Hello, M Stranka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martin Stranka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]