User talk:M Rob1119

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Candace Cameron Bure has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Candace Cameron Bure was changed by M Rob1119 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875082 on 2016-03-22T00:41:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

M Rob1119, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi M Rob1119! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fuller House (TV series). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You have been constantly inserting and reinserting the hyphen in the name of Candace Cameron Bure, both here and at this actress' article. I suggest you provide your input at Talk:Candace Cameron Bure#Disagreement about hyphenation and dehyphenation of name regarding your edits with the hyphen. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —Musdan77 (talk) 16:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kendall-K1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jamie Lynn Spears, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple speedy deletion nominations

A tag has been placed on multiple images requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the files appear to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page(s) and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The above notice applies to the following images:

Please be aware that all material you find somewhere else on the web is likely to be copyrighted. Please stop uploading copyright violations. Continual violations will result in the revocation of your editing privileges. If you have any questions please feel free to ask me and I will be happy to assist you. --Majora (talk) 03:38, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't upload any more copyright images that you find online

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. I noticed you are uploading images, all of which have been tagged for deletion or are already deleted. Please don't upload any more photos that you find on the Internet or elsewhere. Photos that you find online are copyright, and we are not allowed to display them on this wiki. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not upload any further images until you have taken the time to read and understand our policies. Continuing on your present course will likely lead to a block. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Smart

Please read the policy at WP:NICKNAME. Do not add "Pam" in the middle of her full name. Regards, Tarl N. (talk) 00:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About your edit to Scarlett Johansson.

Hi, I felt like I should let you know that my edit summary here is not entirely accurate. You can still mention the ones who are independently notable inside the infobox, even if they don't have a Wikipedia page of their own; make sure to cite sources though. Thankfully, BullRangifer pointed that out to me on my talk page. Cheers! -- ChamithN (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Including children's names in WP:BLP infoboxes (see Scarlett Johansson)

Per Template:Infobox person's statement about the children parameter...
"Only if independently notable themselves or particularly relevant. Number of children (e.g., three or 3), or list of names if notable, in which case, separate entries using Plainlist or Unbulleted list. For privacy reasons, consider omitting the names of children of living persons, unless notable."
I have reverted your edit. If you wish to discuss your rationale for your including the name of Johansson's child in her article's infobox, let's take any further discussion to the article's talk page. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 19:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, M Rob1119. You have new messages at Talk:Chrissy Teigen.
Message added 20:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shearonink (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kelli Berglund. See specifically WP:BLPPRIVACY about birth info Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sean Covel. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As before, still applies Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Abraham Quintanilla, Jr.. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name Changes

Hello! Can you please explain why you have repeated altered names on the pages Maksim Chmerkovskiy and Peta Murgatroyd? Without an edit summary it is unclear why these changes are being made. As it is, I see no reason to change names that have been in place for years without incident. Also, I would recommend you start a discussion on any name changes on the talk pages if you would like to build a consensus for your changes. Thank you. Knope7 (talk) 23:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not only do you need consensus for name changes you need high quality reliable sources as is required for all bio info per WP:BLP. Most of the changes you have made (and that includes on the IPs you are using when logged out) are not supported by any reliable sources, just your assertions made without even giving an explanation in the edit summary. Name changes are rare and unexplained changes of this sort are always suspect. That includes any spelling changes as well. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making the same edits over and over again. If you have a strong reason, or a source that supports your position, please start a discussion on the relevant talk pages. Knope7 (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Likely 162.198.55.110 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 162.207.106.202 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Note both have been blocked for changed names in articles without references, same pattern as noted here. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, please login when you edit. Editing the same articles as an IP is going to get you a lengthy block. Second, please actually read what other editors are telling you. Provide sources and explain why you are changing article text. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tia Mowry. Name changes MUST be well-referenced - a change in spelling is a change in name Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Gabrielle Union. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noted that was also editing while blocked as 162.198.48.204 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 162.198.55.69 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended to three months for socking --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And extended again because of further block-evasion. You have been told how to request an unblock, and "just ignore the block and use other accounts to evade it" is not what you were told to do. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/M Rob1119, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your block is now indefinite due to repeated sockpuppetry. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, M Rob1119. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]