User talk:MVillani1985

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --BJ 19:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your post on WT:ADOPT

In case you haven't go the page watchlisted, I've replied to your question at Wikipedia talk:Adopt-a-User#I'd like to becomg an adopter. --Sopoforic (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. MVillani1985 22:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by others users on Altoona-related articles

As you are already aware, there has been consistent vandalism to Altoona-related articles as well as your user pages. Despite these edits coming from different IPs, the nature of the edits indicates that they are being performed by one (or at most: a select few) individual(s). It also appears likely that the individual(s) know you personally, as random strangers generally wouldn't have such persistence to direct their libel toward you directly. I am pursuing the issue with the internet service provider -- which is the same across all of the IP addresses making the edits. Any information you may be able to provide would be greatly appreciated. If you know the individual(s), you may be able to file a lawsuit against the individual(s) for libel, slander, harassment, etc. Cheers! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 00:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this is much appreciated. Unfortunately, I do know this user from a site I used to post on back when I had very controversial viewpoints which have since changed for the better. MVillani1985 (talk) 14:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have a really cool page, I love football and the format is nice. Sorry but I'm a Pitt fan but i hope the lions win too! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.200.128.186 (talk) 10:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Umbrubru Forest

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Umbrubru Forest, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Umbrubru Forest is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Umbrubru Forest, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must say that your predictions were very close, its hard to get them all right but you did fine. Looking forward to the new predictions for this year. Go PSU

Talk pages

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High-low skirt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Voice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Pangender

An article that you have been involved in editing, Genderqueer, has been proposed for a merge with the article Pangender. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. --April Arcus (talk) 07:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

19-0: The Historic Championship Season of New England's Unbeatable Patriots listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 19-0: The Historic Championship Season of New England's Unbeatable Patriots. Since you had some involvement with the 19-0: The Historic Championship Season of New England's Unbeatable Patriots redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zappa 24 Mati 21:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 19-0: The Historic Championship Season of New England's Unbeatable Patriots for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 19-0: The Historic Championship Season of New England's Unbeatable Patriots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/19-0: The Historic Championship Season of New England's Unbeatable Patriots (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — DeeJayK (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Value Shitty listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Value Shitty. Since you had some involvement with the Value Shitty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Value Shitty

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Ueutyi (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was a common nickname for Value City in the region the stores existed. The nickname is meant in good fun, not to be hurtful, as a pun on the store's name, used mostly by the regular customers. Kind of like when people call Wal-Mart something like Wal-Fart. I made a redirect because I didn't feel mentioning the local nickname was appropriate for the article since it would probably detract from the professional intent. And it's hard to share context within a redirect. MVillani1985 (talk) 22:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super Mario Sauerkraut listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Super Mario Sauerkraut. Since you had some involvement with the Super Mario Sauerkraut redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, wow I'm just finding out about this. We used to call it "Super Mario Sauerkraut" back in the day because "Super Kart" looked a tiny bit like sauerkraut if you had a good imagination. But I get why you got rid of it, too weird and esoteric of a nickname. So I won't be contesting its removal. MVillani1985 (talk) 02:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MVillani1985. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brokenbridge, Colorado

Hello, MVillani1985. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Brokenbridge, Colorado, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Frmorrison (talk) 16:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MVillani1985. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! If you found me from remembering me from a long time ago, I'm likely nothing like the silly/impish/shock jock/controversial person I was back in 2003-2008.

I haven't logged into this account in ages. I forgot I even had it. I'm going to try to do a better job contributing to Wikipedia than I did back in the day.

"Invulnerable Puppy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Invulnerable Puppy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Invulnerable Puppy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 16:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Peanus" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Peanus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 1 § Peanus until a consensus is reached. 162.83.141.156 (talk) 01:04, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The School Up North" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The School Up North has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 3 § The School Up North until a consensus is reached. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]