User talk:MUW Fan
Copyright issue with United States v. Fordice
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, United States v. Fordice, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.aaregistry.com/african_american_history/2474/_United_States_v_Fordice_ruled_on. As a copyright violation, United States v. Fordice appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. United States v. Fordice has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:United States v. Fordice. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at United States v. Fordice, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 02:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Glad to hear it was an accident and that a proper article will be contributed. Happy editing! -- Butseriouslyfolks 04:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Hartford College for Women might be deleted
[edit]A tag has been placed on Hartford College for Women, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Will (Talk - contribs) 07:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on University of Saint Mary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template{{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Will (Talk - contribs) 07:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Category for Discussion notice
[edit]--Djrobgordon 08:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Also related to this issue
[edit]- Thanks for the message, and for not taking my proposal the wrong way. I was having trouble thinking of how to rename it myself, and I think W1219's suggestion is better than mine. I agree that it's a valid category. Actually, the first thing I did when I saw that you'd added it to Sarah Lawrence College was make sure it wasn't a duplicated category, because I was shocked something similar didn't already exist.
- I'd be glad to help you with any questions you might have about POV, but if you're just talking about this category, it wasn't an issue. The name wasn't biased. My only concern was that, taken literally, it implied that the schools were simultaneously women only and coeducational. It was a simple language issue.
- I'm assuming you've already checked out WP:NPOV, but if you haven't, you should. Also, take a look at WP:CITE. Often, when another editor deletes text and argues that it doesn't adhere to NPOV, the real problem is that it's not attributed to a source. A couple of editors went back and forth recently about whether Sarah Lawrence should be called a "selective" college. It is, of course, but the statement was removed because there wasn't a citation to back it up. Editors sometimes adhere to this policy to the point of absurdity. If you want an example, check out any of the six archived discussions on Talk:Wayne Gretzky (one of which I naively inserted myself into) about whether he can be referred to as the "greatest hockey player of all-time." One more article you should take a look at is WP:WEASEL, as well as some of the "See also" links at the bottom of the page. There are plenty of legitimate uses for the words and phrases listed, but so many editors remove them on sight that I find it easier to avoid them altogether.
- If you've been having your edits deleted for POV reasons and still can't figure out why, point me to the articles, and maybe I can figure out the specific issue. Probably, it's something small and easily fixable. I hope my long-winded answer was somewhat helpful. --Djrobgordon 17:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, you've done a good job in putting together the list. I didn't know there were that many schools with the co-ed thing in common. In response to your message, I second just about everything Djrobgordon wrote above. As for how to improve the category and the template, I guess the schools on the template can be listed in some kind of order (alphabetical may be easiest, or chronological by date it went co-ed). Sorry the articles for St. Mary and Hartford got deleted, I can help you recreate them but I don't know anything about those schools offhand. Wl219 03:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
RE: Colleges that were once all female but now aren't
[edit]- Hey, MUW. Thanks for appreciating my input. I really like the category. Good job with that initiative. I see you've also worked a lot on Mississippi University for Women and such. I hope you learn more about Wikipedia through this little renaming process. Wikipedia is surprisingly deep and fun to delve into. If you ever need some help with anything, feel free to ask! But in the end, keep in mind that in this community your opinion is equal to all other contributors. Welcome and keep up the good work! Kushboy 06:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Chabot.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Chabot.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi MUW Fan! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! |
Speedy deletion nomination of MUW Alumni Association
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on MUW Alumni Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 04:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)