User talk:MTWY

Based on editing pattern, article choices, and writing style, I express a significant concern that this user may be a new block-evading sock of Dingbat2007. (Compare with the contributions of recently blocked sock Wyevergreen.) - Dravecky (talk) 10:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has resumed editing from this account and the available evidence points to this account being a sockpuppet of banned user Dingbat2007. - Dravecky (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KGFXTowerSite.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KGFXTowerSite.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rumors in articles

We don't deal in rumors. Period. Never add any kind of speculation to an article you can't back up with any sources like you did in Radio Fargo-Moorhead, Inc.. Nate • (chatter) 07:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kramarczuk_deli.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kramarczuk_deli.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KBXE-FM

The article KBXE-FM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:Notability. "will be" and "still unknown" are phrases that indicate that there is insufficient information about this station yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

MTWY (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.235.68.97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: sockpuppet of blocked user Dingbat2007

Blocking administrator: Dravecky (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

ATTENTION:

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

MTWY (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.235.68.97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "MTWY". The reason given for MTWY's block is: "Block evasion: sockpuppet of blocked user Dingbat2007".

Blocking administrator: Dravecky (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Even if what you said is true, then I am afraid that we cannot unblock this account because it has been compromised. –MuZemike 16:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE: We've had renters here for the past two years, and they ARE NOW GONE! We feel this computer problem is the result of their time here. We have run into other computer troubles here, such as banking accounts, etc.

I am physically handicaped and love my time with the hours of reading and research my wife and I do together online. Being retired from broadcasting and the fire department,It is a joy I can still do.

Deleting us from your site is devastating!! Thank you for the time to explain.

I suggest you start a fresh account; if indeed your computer security was compromised by renters, you'll need to begin anew with an account that's not been abused. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Country Inn & Suites for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Country Inn & Suites is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Inn & Suites until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matthew hk (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mt. Rushmore Broadcasting

The article Mt. Rushmore Broadcasting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet either the WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]