User talk:MRuniqat

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 23:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content and making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MRuniqat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

EVERYONE can confirm the mentioned Virus by trying to install S2020 in a VM. It is not unsourced god damn MRuniqat (talk) 22:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This has been explained to you repeatedly. WP:IDHT comes into play here. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A note to the reviewing admin: What MRuniqat says is of course not true. Confirming a virus by installing the software is not possible (you simply cannot know for sure a program contains a virus just by installing it—even if some antivirus software says the program contains a virus, that still does not mean it does, false positives are ubiquitous, and it most definitely does not mean the creator of the program bundles the virus intentionally, as MRuniqat keeps claiming—an exceptionally serious accusation). And even if it was possible, original research is not a reliable source. But all these things have been explained to MRuniqat several times, including my detailed explanation. MRuniqat simply keeps ignoring (and deleting) the explanations. Unblocking is, of course, not an option at all.—J. M. (talk) 22:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MRuniqat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a hard time to proof that the User JM was wrong with his permanent deletions of the additions I made to the article back then. I would like to be unblocked, Ill try to avoid getting in touch with JM in the future. Articles like Compaq Portable 386 are mainly my work and should be enough proof of the quality I contribute to Wiki and that Ive been the victim of an overreacting mod troll. MRuniqat (talk) 15:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Making personal attacks against the blocking admin who's block was both valid and upheld by another administrator is an automatic decline. Please read WP:GAB.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:09, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.