User talk:MKarlsssson

December 2018

Your recent editing history at Multiple chemical sensitivity shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 08:52, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did attempt to have a conversation with you after you deleted all the new edits from the past few days.

Did you see my attempt to start a conversation on your talk page? You didn't respond. I'm still figuring out how to use talk. Don't know if I did it right MKarlsssson (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2018 (UTC)MKarlssssonMKarlsssson (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw it and considered it and replied on my talk page. There are about four accounts editing that page with a very similar WP:POV and wonder are you using multiple accounts or are they your friends from off-wiki?--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 09:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MKarlsssson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MKarlsssson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Multiple chemical sensitivity

Hi, please can you sign your posts in each separate talk page section?--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 14:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it for you. I think you may also have double clicked on the signature icon when making the signature that you did make thus making a double signature. You only need to click it once.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 02:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting that for me and sorry for the error. It was my mistake. Thanks also for taking the time to read my thoughts and for sharing yours. I'll reply to the new comments shortly. MKarlsssson (talk) 05:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)MKarlsssson[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of SamuelBurckhalter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]