User talk:MJKingofMusic

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Rockosteve (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Associated Acts

The associated acts section is considered to be artists that had a major impact in the person career not every person who knew and worked with Jackson period, this editing is considered borderline disruptive please stop. Secret ^account 20:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Secret, and to be clear, MJ and Paul recorded three songs together total between 1982-83 ("The Girl is Mine", "Say Say Say", and "The Man"), and they never worked together again. McCartney has recorded more songs with Elvis Costello, Eric Stewart, and David Gilmour than he did with MJ. — GabeMc (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Michael Jackson. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 17:43, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Michael Jackson. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Pol430 talk to me 17:43, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, MJKingofMusic. You have new messages at Pol430's talk page.
Message added 17:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pol430 talk to me 17:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Michael Jackson with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dusty777 18:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given that your edits to the Michael Jackson article are bordering on an edit war, deleting discussions—even old ones—from the article's talk page is a very bad idea. —C.Fred (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SabreBD (talk) 17:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:You Rock My World.png

Thanks for uploading File:You Rock My World.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR on Michael Jackson article

Your recent editing history at Michael Jackson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Also, you are a sock puppet of User:Rockosteve, and continue to edit war over the same content. You are disrupting the encyclopedia and inserting content that breaks reliable sourcing and copyright guidelines. It does not seem to me that you are willing to ever understand these rules, or even have a desire to. Dave Dial (talk) 21:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Please see this section on Edit Warring at WP:EDITWARRING. You need to have reached a consensus on talk page of Michael Jackson article before making changes. If you don't have that consensus, you can't just keep making the changes you personally prefer. It looks like you've received warnings about this from other editors. So please be aware that your account can be blocked if you continue to ignore Wikipedia editing etiquette.Jpcohen (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:You Rock My World.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:You Rock My World.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 00:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to Wikipedia as sources

Wikipedia can not be used as a reliable source, as it is user generated. Do not add that information again as it will be promptly removed. Also note that it is a featured article, so significant changes should be discussed to ensure they meet the featured article criteria. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Jackson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Further, your edit summary of "Minor spelling correction" suggests an intent to mislead about the nature of the edit. —C.Fred (talk) 02:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Jackson, you may be blocked from editing. You have now used a false edit summary a second time.[1] Further attempts to misrepresent your edits will be dealt with as intentional disruption. —C.Fred (talk) 02:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Jackson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Jackson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of artists influenced by Michael Jackson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Game (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MJKingofMusic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]