User talk:MELB1110

Stop PoV pushing with an agenda

Stop PoV pushing as you're doing currently with two accounts. [1] - [2].

- LouisAragon (talk) 07:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC) -LouisAragon my background is Armenian, I know my ancestry, please don't object.[reply]

Geographical location of Armenia

Consensus on Wikipedia is that Armenia lies geographically in Western Asia. You are welcome to bring reliable scientific sources (i.e Royal Geographical Society, not BBC, RAI, and so on) that show geographical definitions of Europe from which it derives another continental location of Armenia. Alex2006 (talk) 08:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes I have www.worldatlas.com as a reference and it is a reliable source for geography; in addition Armenia is in the South Caucasus which is considered in Eastern Europe. My background is Armenian and I can assure you we are certainly not considered as Asian. I found it a bit offensive. Thanks

Please stop taking out my research, it is offensive.

I will complain to wikipedia about this if you don't change it back to the worldatlas.com reference I inserted. You are offending a nation.

June 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Armenia. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alex2006 (talk) 09:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 09:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice about Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

.

Alex2006 (talk) 09:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Armenia. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Alex2006 (talk) 13:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban on Armenia

You are edit warring against consensus and editing disruptively on Armenia despite repeated explanations on the article talkpage and warnings on this page. In my role as uninvolved administrator, I have therefore topic banned you from Armenia and related pages, broadly construed, for one month. That means that for the next month you must not make any edits to Armenia or its talkpage, or edit anything to do with Armenia on other pages. If you should do that, you will be blocked. The ban has been logged here. If you want to appeal the ban, please read this. Bishonen | talk 13:54, 2 July 2015 (UTC).[reply]

I should have linked Topic ban for you, sorry. You can read here exactly what a topic ban entails. As you can see, you're not allowed to discuss the topic of Armenia anywhere on Wikipedia. I make an exception for discussion of the ban itself with me on my page, or on any of the other pages mentioned here. Bishonen | talk 15:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Blocked

I'm surprised to see you have ignored my topic ban above, and have continued to discuss Armenia on Talk:Armenia as well as on userpages. Didn't you read it? Didn't you understand it? I'm afraid I'm now going to clarify that I was serious by blocking you for 24 hours. If you violate your ban again when you return, you will get a longer block. I hope it's quite clear now. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 16:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC).[reply]