User talk:MD Ashfak ul Islam

This user may sometimes share an IP address with [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]].

Previously edited

I use a shared id and don't abuse it

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MD Ashfak ul Islam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my old account, in this account i didn’t do any kind of abusive things. Recently I want to edit all tye village page of Chittagong Division but i was blocked. Please escape me from these curse. ASHFAK COYON is my new account but I made this account 3 years ago.Please unblock me..I am also aware of Wikipedia terms and conditions. But in the 1st page i also edit that i use shared ip..please unblock me.. MD Ashfak ul Islam (talk) 16:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MD Ashfak ul Islam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use shared ip which i previously tell. ulblock me.MD Ashfak ul Islam (talk) 13:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC):

Decline reason:

You have already admitted sockpuppetry, so a claim of a shared IP address won't help you. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 14:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Desperately seeking unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MD Ashfak ul Islam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

check my edits, is there any abusive use please block me otherwise give me chance to edit Wikipedia MD Ashfak ul Islam (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC) :

Decline reason:

Per below. At this point since it's clear you really don't have any valid arguments, and indeed your English-language skills may not be up to the task, I am revoking your access to this page as you have crossed the line into wasting our time. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Assuming that's accurate, every single edit here was abusive, as every single edit was in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. At least, every single edit since that account was blocked on 2021-01-08. Yamla (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

Could anyone be kind.

I'll make you aware of WP:SO. However, on the flip side please see WP:3X. Pahunkat (talk) 08:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"is there any abusive use please block me". Yes, as I already pointed out to you. Every edit with this account was abusive. I even pointed you to the policy showing you why they were abusive. --Yamla (talk) 12:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]