User talk:MD380

This user is a student editor in University_at_Albany/Information_Literacy_in_the_Humanities_and_Arts_(Fall_2021) .

Welcome!

Hello, MD380, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have an overdue training assignment.

Please complete the assigned training modules. --TrudiJ (talk) 12:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WCI review

History section edit did a good job, highlight the two important words and makes reader catch the main point clearly. New section provides a complete and fair perspective to explain the 2021 Anti-LGBTQ Bill. 169.226.221.154 (talk) 15:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WCI Peer Review

Something that needs work is keeping the article neutral and the balance coverage. I felt as though a lot of the article was one sided and other points of view could've been talked about more. The lead was executed well and was simple, straight to the point, without too much detail about the article. The structure could also be improved, I think the 2021 arrest section should go after the police action section. Mayawilkerson (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response to peer review

Thank you for leaving your peer review on my page! I have looked over the lead in the article I'm editing, and I decided to move a few paragraphs to later sections of the article, so I can focus on summarizing. I made sure to mention all the relevant sections covered in the article so readers can get a better sense of the article. I also took out the sentence "historically, women...," because I figured it was common knowledge enough for it to be irrelevant to that section. I don't plan on changing the second sentence you mentioned, beginning with "this myth is about perception; Kings believes..." because this sentence is grammatically correct. It could work with the semicolon, as semicolons join together two sentences. However, that sentence itself is super long, so I broke up the sentence later on. I wanted to keep the two ideas about perception together in one sentence, then I started a new sentence when I introduce the new idea of perceptions being internalized. I also found a fourth source that I am using to add information about the concept of "role overload." Your suggestions really helped! Thank you Emma Adriana (talk) 17:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]