User talk:MChapman5/sandbox

It seems that your paragraph so far is a little unfocused, which is understandable given the amount of content but be sure to clean it up a little. For instance, the article is about ubiquitylation and plant immunity but one of your sentences goes into great detail about all the stuff that ubiquitin does. It may be more relevant to discuss these various mechanisms in terms of immunity, especially since trujillo 2010 talks about Jasmonic acid, salycylic acid, and ethylene signaling which are very important to plants. This is just my opinion, but I think the last sentence would really benefit from a specific example. For instance a mutant in ubiquitin pathway that has increased sensitivity to pathogens. It might also be interesting to look into E3 ligases as you expand your article. From what I've read, the ubiquitin mediated response seems to be an innate type response. So it is reasonable that the specificity of one of the hundreds of E3 ligases might be part of the innate immunity of plants. Maximus155 (talk) 03:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Grammatically, it looks good to me. BreCaitlin (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)