User talk:M12592
Talk
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Please join the Talk:R68 (New York City Subway car) discussion.
[edit]I've posted a prompt for consensus editing and cooperation on the talk page, please join and try to work towards a solution. ThuranX 03:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Instead of playing with the image size, please try to work towards a asolution on the page, thank you. ThuranX 02:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Dear M12592, this is the third time I have invited you to participate in a discussion about the section you keep trying to add to the R68 article. If you do no participate, you may find yourself reverted forever, and the information never ecoming an accepted aprt of the article. Further, you are perilously close to recieving a block for violation of 3RR. Further, if you persist, I will seek a second block for tendentious editing. Instead of creating more ill will, I ask again, please come use the talk page. Explain WHY your information should be included, and give us sources to use as references to back up your assertions. Thank you. ThuranX 21:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- I see you have yet again reverted to an unsourced version of the page, without using the talk page. At this point, I am giving you a final chance to use the talk page, explain your decisions, and work positively. Further, having examined your edit history, I am led to believe that you are a possible sock puppet of User:DCarltonsm@msn.com. As such, I will be going to checkuser. ThuranX 04:24, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Are you aware of the Three revert rule?
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on R68 (New York City Subway car). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. —Dgiest c 18:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)