User talk:M.jesionek

Your submission at Articles for creation: Israel Jacob Kligler has been accepted

Israel Jacob Kligler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris Troutman (talk) 01:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

Zalman Greenberg and Anton Alexander are the authors of the hebrew version of Israel Jacob Kligler Anton's web site http://www.eradication-of-malaria.com/ has ppt slides of the file http://www.malariaworld.org/sites/default/files/Geoff-DECEMBER%202013%20Hebrew%20U%20-%20%20For%20PRINTING.pdf

Zalman & Anton have given us full permission to use any of their data from all their publications and they hold the copyright of the information in these publications

We dont mind your edits but do mind that you are assuming a copyright violation. You should be aware from the outset that the english version was based on the hebrew version.

M.jesionek (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstand. Per WP:COPY, all Wikipedia content is "creative commons" licensed so deriving this English-language article from the Hebrew-language article isn't the issue. Taking content from other websites is. If you wish to donate content to Wikipedia, read WP:DCM. It is not enough to simply post a statement on a talk page.

You're pretty new here to mind my editing. You're welcome. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits of page Israel_Jacob_Kligler

To editor Chris troutman:

I do not understand some of the changes carried out by the user "Arminden" as for example at some stage references to 'The Times of Israel' were changed to 'Haaretz' then back again

and the most recent paragraph added - i.e.

Some blame it though on issues between Klinger and other members of the local academia. As of 2012, The Times of Israel newspaper concluded that only "two Kligler loyalists are waging a lonely battle to restore him to what they see as his rightful place in the history of Israel and of the fight against malaria." These are named as the retired Israeli scientist Zalman Greenberg, former director of the Health Ministry’s Public Health Laboratory in Jerusalem, and the retired London lawyer Anton Alexander. The former is an experienced researcher and author on the topic of medical history in Mandate Palestine and Israel, while the latter has been very active outside Israel and has set up a website highlighting Klinger's achievements. Greenberg goes as far as to doubt that there would have been a State of Israel without Kligler's contribution at eradicating malaria.[62] This very Wikipedia page has only been created in May 2014, a Hebrew version existing since May 2013 when it was created by the same Zalman Greenberg.

this seems inappropriate to wikipedia in particular the last sentence

The user with the Romanian login name - "Arminden"

I note has already had a page deleted as G3. Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes

and spends most their time editing other peoples pages related to Israel

Can I edit out some of the changes or is this users actions just normal acceptable behavior ?

thanks

M.jesionek (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit; frequently anyone shows up and edits. If you don't like anyone's edits, you can revert them. The paragraph you mentioned is referenced and the reference is from a reliable source and does say what the paragraph claims. I did remove the last sentence as it was self-referential. No one owns Wikipedia articles, so Arminden's edits don't violate any Wikipedia rules. Typically when you disagree with the editing on an article, the best thing to do is ping them like you did me using {{to}} on the article's talk page. Next time you see a problem, feel free to revert that edit and discuss it on Talk:Israel Jacob Kligler. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Chris troutman:

well to use the quotation on your page "Whatever Wikipedia as a community is doing, it is more of a vehicle for contributors’ self-indulgence than it is a concerted endeavour to bring free knowledge to the world."

So I cant be bothered fixing the other errors i.e. ref 5 is duplicated as references 61 and 62 and there is no mention of Brit Shalom in ref 61 and maybe your bots will fix this as it all seems a waste of time

M.jesionek (talk) 06:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]