User talk:M-ustafetani

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Isaaq has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 20:25, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Isaaq. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 05:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Isaaq. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 02:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you have sources, you should add them at the time you add the new information - as per Wikipedia policy, "the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." Please see WP:V and WP:RS. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sheikh Isaaq Bin Ahmed Al- Hashimi

A tag has been placed on Sheikh Isaaq Bin Ahmed Al- Hashimi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KimiNewt (talk) 01:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Dir (clan) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. (link) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Dir (clan), as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 04:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]