User talk:Mário/archive4

Archive number 4 of my talk page, created on August 1 2006.

Reino de Portu-Cale

Please read here [1] this article about the: Os suevos já não têm concorrentes. Durante mais de uma centúria sustenta-se o seu reino na parte noroeste da Península. Alarga-se até o Tejo com a capital em Braga (já sede de um bispado desde Diocleciano) e chama-se Reino de Portu-Cale - do nome de dois castros fronteiros nas margens do Douro. Best regards--José Manuel CH--GE 12:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Portugal

Well well well Portugal is in the semis now. Lets see if they beat brazil... and if brazil makes it. Portugal winning the cup would be awesome :D sikander 20:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CCCP

Nice work on the kits. SLUMGUM yap stalk 23:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Portuguese Communist Party

I'm working on copyediting the article and improving it so it can be a good article. I hope you like my changes. Grand master ka 08:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a lot going on here and in real life; I'll get back to it soon (maybe tonight.) Grand master ka 20:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"During the campaign, some supporters of his candidacy had been imprisoned and Gomes himself had been spanked in the Rio Tinto."

The word "spanked" makes no sense there. I'm not sure what you meant. Grand master ka 00:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unterseeboot 1 (1936)

The article should be at Unterseeboot 36 (1936), where I have now moved it. I was copy and pasting to keep the form from my pervious articles, forgot to change a number in the disambiguation page and accidentally created this. I have already done Unterseeboot 1 (1935). Thanks for the note on it looking good though--Jackyd101 17:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Thanks for your support in my RfA!

Thanks for voting!
Hello Mário/archive4, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Goings-on

Respondi de novo em Talk:History of Portugal#Subdivisions of the History of Portugal. Já agora, obrigado pela tua opinião sobre a lista dos primeiros-ministros. Quanto a isso vou, mais uma vez, responder-te por pontos:

Introdução: falta mesmo, mas julgo que não será difícil
Numeração confusa: concordo. No entanto, acho que é essencial pelo menos ter a numeração desde o início da república, e também desde o início da democracia (1974). O que sugeres?
Imagens: a mesma história do costume. Vai ser difícil, era mesmo bom arranjar um livro com imagens que pudessemos fazer cópias pequenas de pouca qualidade (que normalmente são aceites) e ainda assim conseguir referenciar o autor da fotografia. Esse é o grande problema, porque imagens conseguidas na net mesmo que tenham pouca qualidade ou cujo copyright tenha expirado continuam a não ser legais se não mencionarem o autor.
Tamanho das images: acho que podemos remendar isso
Vasco Leotte de Almeida Costa: este senhor apareceu na lista da versão lusófona e eu limitei-me a repeti-la, apesar de não o conhecer. Aliás, ele apareceu lá com o nome de António Almeida e Costa. No entanto, no site do governo, na parte histórica, temos que o governo de Pinheiro de Azevedo tinha como ministro mais importante logo a seguir Vasco Leotte de Almeida Costa, que (presumo eu) terá substituido o Pinheiro de Azevedo após este ter tido um ataque cardíaco durante a campanha presidencial.
Obrigado pelo teu excelente empenho. Joao pais 03:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal

Só para te avisar que Póvoa de Varzim foi já seleccionada no primeiro "selected place". Sugiro, por exemplo, Alcobaça. Um abraço. Joao pais 14:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal links

Portal links may appear in other articles, but do you think that's helpful? Portals are meant for the editors, and are not held to the same standards as articles. Don't you think it makes more sense to include them in talk pages? 172 | Talk 09:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changing names

I have about 6500 edits, is it possible to change my user name? Will it be a hard task? I don't want to bother anybody, if it isn't easy, I'll keep this one. Just one more question, if I change username, will my previous name appear on the article history or will the new one replace it? Mário 14:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is possible to change your user name. The max edits has been raised to 200,000.
No, it is an easy task for us. Please read WP:CHU for instructions on submitting a request and finding if a username is available.
No, your old username will be changed to the new username across all page histories. Your old signature, however will remain static across wikipedia.
Remember that once we change your username, it will be available for others to choose. You'd have to recreate it again and have an admin permanently block it. (It's on the instructions on WP:CHU)

Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessary to change all links. You can redirect from your old userpages. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:56, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Luz Station

Thanks for letting me know about the change.

I read the article and it looks good. There are some minor tweaks to be made to it (the word "neighborhood" doesn't quite make sense there... Do you mean the area around the Luz?) But its pretty good and saves me some effort. Thanks. Grand master ka 19:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh... The quality standards on PT.WP are certainly not what they are here. Your article is quite good. I will be editing articles less until after my RfA ends... Then maybe I can help more at Portal:Portugal and Wikipedia:WikiProject Portuguese geography. Grand master ka 07:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Novas

Olá, tudo bem? Com que então mudança de nome. Se não é indiscrição minha, posso saber a razão? Agora trato-te por Mário? É verdade, da outra vez que te falei sobre a Póvoa de Varzim já ter sido seleccionada, tinha umas horas antes escrito uma coisa mais acima, que se calhar não viste, porque eles só avisam da última mensagem. Vê aqui se ainda não viste. É porque estava à espera de uma resposta daquilo da História porque estou um bocado com vontande de avançar com um trabalho a fundo para a frente. Um abraço deste humilde utilizador, que em nada se pode comparar com o teu árduo e construtivo trabalho aqui na comunidade (pareces estar em todo o lado!) Joao pais 22:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kneseth members

I'm not interested in getting into a flamewar with you about "occupation". Cheers, Tom e r ^talk 00:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Peter of Rates

Mário, se pudesses gostava que desses a tua opinião aqui numa discussão que estou a ter com o Pedro. Joao pais 18:44, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Palestinian state.PNG

Hello.

I was wondering what you meant by the above image. Do you mean that the Israelis and Palestinians should just drop their weapons and have a state together? Or are you advocating genocide? Or something else?

Thanks, -- Where 16:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. If I am interpreting you correctly, you feel that Arab-Israelis are currently treated as a subserviant people? And you thus feel that you think two wrongs make a right and that Jewish people in Israel/Palestine should be treated as inferiors? I am not sure if I am understanding you correctly. -- Where 17:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In all honesty, I find your accusation that Arab-Israelis are being treated like the Jews were treated under the Nazi regime quite horrifying. While there is unfortunately some discrimination, Arab-Israelis are capable of voting and holding any type of job. And no Arab-Isrealis are being forcing into concentration camps and gassed. In fact, the only deliberate killings of Arab-Israelis that I can think of were by Jewish-Israeli terrorists, and these instances do not happen very often. However, I am relieved to find that this disagreement is just a disagreement on what is actually happening, rather than a disagreement on what should happen. We both agree in equality and human rights. I would recommend, however, that you add to the caption of the image on your page a clarification stating that you believe in equality; many people can and will interpret it quite differently. -- Where 17:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There's no need to remove the picture; it isn't meant as an attack image, and you thus have every right to have it. I was just recommending that you point out that you are advocating equality, rather than genocide or reduced-citizenship for Jews. But that's just a suggestion, not a request. Your call. -- Where 19:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I misinterpreted you, BTW. -- Where 19:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry; you were completely civil and your English was almost perfect. Happy editing! -- Where 19:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Porto

Hey man, noticed you changed your name... Portugal may be behind me but I'm keeping an eye on things. Page Up (talk · contribs) has been making some page moves, particularly on Greater Porto and friends. I'm sure you noticed but just making sure he knows what he's doing. If you need my help with anything... Deizio talk 21:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Olá. Pois, quanto aos dados populacionais, enquanto os "actualizava" ia-me apercebendo da tendência de regressão da população. Eu arranjei, nem sei bem como, uma revista que aparentemente existe chamada "Guia Autarcas e Autarquias 2006", uma edição da Iberbyte que tem os nomes de todos os ocupantes de cargos a nível nacional desde o Presidente da República até todos os presidentes de junta. Além disso tem a informação da população para cada municípo. Ao ver que era um livro de 2006 calculei que a informação estivesse actualizada. Mas já não estou tão seguro disso. Uma razão para isto talvez seja a diferença de pessoas registadas no município e as que de facto nele residem. Não sei. Talvez fosse melhor re-colocar a informação anterior, que julgo que tiraste da Associação Nacional de Municípios, não foi? Quanto à "old region", tive dificuldade em arranjar-lhe um nome. Talvez "Natural regions", como eram chamadas no Estado Novo, ou "provinces" como também se dizia no Estado Novo coloquialmente. Uma coisa que joga a favor destas regiões semi-naturais é o facto de ainda serem preponderantes, talvez não em questões políticas ou técnicas, mas mais no dia-a-dia. Algarve, Alentejo, Ribatejo, Minho ou Trás-os-Montes são ainda hoje importantes como factores de unidade regional. Além disso dizem mais às pessoas que muitas vezes se orgulham do facto de serem algarvios, alentejanos, ribatejanos, minhotos ou transmontanos. Outras como a Beira Litoral, o Douro Litoral e a Estremadura cairam mais-ou-menos em desuso mas ainda lhes vislumbro importância sociológica. Quantas vezes não ouvimos falar no derby minhoto (V. Guimarães vs. Sp. Braga), na frase da Dª Odete da Contra Informação: "o Alentejo ainda será nosso", na lezíria ribatejana, no isolamento de Trás-os-Montes e claro no Algarve, que muita fama tem por lá fora? Portanto, isto para dizer que concordo com o que dizes a respeito dos "red links", mas quando estes forem "blue" acho que podíamos recolocar estas regiões na infobox. Quanto aos NUTS pensei nisso, até para não ter uma coisa que dizia Region, Subregion, Old region (um bocado ridículo). Acho que sim, que ficam bem, mas não me choca o Region, Subregion. Um abraço, e boas férias se for caso disso. Joao pais 00:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Palace DYK

On 12 July, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mafra National Palace, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Mgm|^(talk) 20:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA thanks

Hello Mário/archive4, and thank you for your support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of (105/2/0). I was very pleased with the outpouring of kind words from the community that has now entrusted me with these tools, from the classroom, the lesson in human psychology and the international resource known as Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Please feel free to leave me plenty of requests, monitor my actions (through the admin desk on my userpage) and, if you find yourself in the mood, listen to some of what I do in real life (I hope we will be able to tour Portugal in the next few years.) In any case, keep up the great work and have a fabulous day. Grand master ka 06:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Pcperu logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Pcperu logo.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support!

Hello Mário and thank you for your support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of (67/0/0)! Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have suggestions or requests - either of an admin nature or otherwise! :)

Wknight94 (Talk | contribs) 23:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, me too!

		Thanks for contributing to my successful RfA!
		To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations! To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well! ♥! ~Kylu (u\|t) 01:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your support! :D ~Kylu (u|t) 01:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lista de cidades de Portugal

Olá, a lista primitiva era um simples decalque da lista existente na página do INE, actualizada à data de 2002, com as tais 134 cidades. As criadas posteriormente, a 26 de Agosto de 2003 e 9 de Dezembro de 2004, por qualquer motivo ainda não foram acrescentadas na dita página; foi uma questão de estar atento ao que saía na comunicação social e aos "pacotes" de elevação de vilas a cidades e de aldeias a vilas promovidas pela Assembleia da República nas datas supramencionadas. Uma pesquisa pela net pode ajudar a corroborar isso: podes ver aqui as sete cidades criadas na primeira ocasião e aqui 8 das remanescentes; por fim, quanto ao Caniço, está aqui a notícia.

Esperando ter sido últil, um abraço

--Brian Boru 19:34, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um adeus?

Fiquei quase em choque quando vi na tua página em letras garrafais: I'VE LEFT. I DON'T KNOW IF I'LL EVER RETURN - pensei, "O quê, o wikipedista português número um vai deixar a wikipedia?". Não te conheço propriamente, mas de qualquer modo, enquanto wikipedista, tenho uma imagem formada de ti onde te vejo como um exemplo de cortesia, tolerancia e experiência neste mundo da wikipedia. E acima de tudo és um dos poucos editores portugueses que por aqui vejo a fazer um trabalho digno de nota e a todos o títulos exemplar (obviamente, por múltiplas razões, estou longe de me poder incluir nesse grupo). Para terminar só quero dizer que a wikipedia vai perder muito se a abandonares e os assuntos relativos a Portugal ainda se degradarão mais. Há pessoas que vão sentir a ausência de um colaborador como tu por aqui. Mas entendo que possam existir fortes e variadas razões para tomar uma decião como essa, eu próprio as considero por vezes. Page Up 19:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Estou sem palavras. Façam já uma petição. Queremos o Mário de volta. Ou ao menos uma explicação. Vá lá, há por aí muita coisa para fazer e não há ninguém como tu para tomar a iniciativa. És provavelmente o mais completo e cordial colaborador no que a assuntos portugueses diz respeito. A wikipédia sem ti é como uma praia sem areia, um dia sem sol, uma festa do Avante sem música ou um Iraque sem bombas. Volta! Joao pais 00:52, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sem dúvida. Grand master ka 23:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sp hbatasuna.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sp hbatasuna.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Wwagner 15:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Pt ltl frs.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pt ltl frs.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Durin 14:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Pt ltl pdcmirn.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pt ltl pdcmirn.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Durin 14:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Apu pcp pt.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Apu pcp pt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Durin 21:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wfdy logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wfdy logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. -- ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 21:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC) (replaced with Image:Wfdy logo.png)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Pt ltl lst.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pt ltl lst.GIF. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Pt ltl prt.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pt ltl prt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Pt ltl aoc.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pt ltl aoc.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned public domain images

The following images were uploaded by you, but are currently not in use. They have been tagged as public domain (PD), either as PD-self or other PD claim. These unused PD images may be subject to deletion as orphans. You may wish to add them to an article, tag them for copying to WP commons {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} or if they are no longer needed, they can be tagged for deletion by you as {{db-author}}. If you have any questions, please leave me a note on my talk page. --Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]