User talk:Mário/archive3

Archive number 3 of my talk page, created on June 30 2006.

A landslide victory for The JPS (aka RFA thanks)

Hey, Mário/archive3, thank you so much for your vote and comments in my RfA, which passed with an overwhelming consensus of 95/2/2. I was very surprised and flattered that the community has entrusted me with these lovely new toys. I ripped open the box and started playing with them as soon as I got them, and I've already had the pleasure of deleting random nonsense/attacks/copyvios tonight.
If I ever do anything wrong, or can help in some way, please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page, and I will do my best to correct my mistake, or whatever...
Now, to that bottle of wine waiting for me...

The JPS ^{talk to me} 21:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A question

A while back I translated the Carmona Rodrigues article, and I was unsure about this, so I thought you would be the person to talk to...

Is the "President of the Municipal Chamber of Lisbon" (Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Lisboa) the same as being the "mayor" (Prefeito) of Lisbon? (Does Portugal really have "mayors"?) The Lisbon article calls him the "mayor". I used both titles in the Rodrigues article. Your thoughts? Grand master ka 06:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Rosetta Barnstar

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		For generally awesome work bringing Portuguese content to the English Wikipedia! Deizio 13:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Names

As above, great work! One point though, taking Paranhos, Porto as an example, do you think it's best to Anglicize place names and not mention the original name? Hospital Sao Joao translates as St. John Hospital, but I would probably go for the original name, possibly with an English version in brackets like: "Hospital Sao Joao (St. John Hospital)" when referring to it, that's what I'm used to seeing in travel guides and most literature about other countries. What do you think? Deizio 13:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you're saying, people and places in a newspaper report about a foreign country would be translated (Like at home the paper would say "King Juan Carlos of Spain", or "the Eiffel Tower") but I think when describing the places in an area for information, the local name and a translation should both be present if possible. My first thought was that the conventional translation to English would be St. John's Hospital, see St Mary's Hospital, St Bartholomew's Hospital and others at the List of hospitals in the UK.

Portugal Template

The Portuguese template is mostly modeled after the Massachusetts template. I structured the template after Portugal's districts and N.U.T.S., according to the Political divisions of Portugal page on Wikipedia. The template is essentially meant to provide better convenience of information to everyone that is browsing information about the country's political geography. Although, there might be revisions needed to it, such as the color of the boxes and the political divisions of the country. Most certainly, you're welcomed to revise the template in any such way to better it, like providing precise information about the country. Thank you for your time!

Zeca Afonso

I did a search for motor nuerone disease and football - in the university years section it clearly states

from 1946 to 1948 he finished high school, after two prior attempts failed due to his chaotic lifestyle spent among the older students. He met Maria Amália de Oliveira, whom he married secretly due to his parents' opposition. He travelled with some of the most important university musical groups and played football for the Associação Académica de Coimbra.

So, I think an apology is due as the article clearly states he WAS a footballer (though this may not have been as a profession) Ianguy 12:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - but for some reason my talk page has now appeared in the category - any idea why??? It doesn't show in the editing box? Ianguy 13:15, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Massarelos

Looks good, I'm not 100% on that part of the city but sounds about right. Great work! Deizio talk 23:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to the Welcoming committee! :) Cmapm 23:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

A, I've proposed the renaming of Grande Área Metropolitana do Porto to Greater Porto. The latter currently redirects to the former, along with several other variations on the name, and I feel that having the regular, simple English form as the main page makes sense. There is a survey on the article talk page. If it goes through I can use AWB to simplify all the redirects.

Speaking of AWB, I've been changing a lot of Oporto links to Porto, and I think you've done a couple as well? Just makes sense, "Oporto" was never more than a historical typo and everyone calls it Porto. I'm not about to change every link, but I think modern references to the city can certainly be changed. Deizio talk 19:30, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's officially both, for example I have friends here who frequent the "Oporto Tennis & Cricket Club", and of course the airport code is OPO, but "Oporto" is becoming archaic relatively quickly. I don't meet many people, here or in the UK who know it as anything except Porto. Deizio talk 21:59, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Porto news

Thanks for the star, like you I really enjoy getting real content in the encyclopedia, and I managed to get Funicular dos Guindais in the Did you know? section on the front page yesterday which is great. Excellent job on turning all the parishes blue on the template. Deizio talk 10:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have to nominate articles, which must be a) less than 5 days old (day of original creation, not last update or time of listing) and b) well written and longer than a stub, at Template talk:Did you know and hope it gets picked. Updates usually happen once a day. Getting Porto to featured article status is something to aim for as well. Deizio talk 11:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vitória Guimarães players

Please do feel free to suggest an appropriate name ... Would Category:Vitória SC players be correct? At least it matches Vitória SC -- ProveIt ^(talk) 14:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply, I'll suggest it to the group -- ProveIt ^(talk) 14:28, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Parish article titles

I wrote a note on the talk page of Template:Parishes of Lisbon without realizing that you created it. The titles of the parishes in the template are all "Parish, Municipality" while the ones we've done for WP:OPO (and all the ones I see on the Pt. Wikipedia) are "Parish (Municipality)". We need to decide which format we're using for all the parishes NOW before we fill in too many of them. (For example, the Porto template has São Nicolau (Porto) while the Lisbon template has São Nicolau, Lisbon.)

I've worked on a couple pages on Neighborhoods of Minneapolis. The standard for that and for other U.S. neighborhoods is "Neighborhood, City". But I would prefer "Parish (Municipality)" for these, and that's what's done on the Pt. Wikipedia. Your thoughts? Grand master ka 06:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, go with "Parish (Municipality)". That's what we've used and that's what PT Wikipedia uses for these... Grand master ka 19:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thankyou

Hi Alfonso, thank for your support for my RFA! --BrownHairedGirl 17:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Freguesias of Portugal

I have no objection to renaming the category. To do it properly, you should list it on WP:CFD and then a bot could move all the articles from one category to the new one. - SimonP 17:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese Colonial War

Hi I am very happy to copy edit the rest of the article but it may take me some time as I only have a little time to do it! But it is a very interesting article about an area that isnt too well known in the UK so I will enjoy doing it [User:Nickhk|Nickhk]

I will copy edit - but understand it may take a few weeks rather than days! Nickhk 22:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for voting on my RfA

Thanks so much for voting!

Thanks so much for voting on my request for adminship. I have decided to withdraw my nomination as it seems that consensus will not be reached. If you voted in support, thanks for putting your trust in me to be a good admin. If you voted in opposition, thank you as well for your constructive criticism as it will only help me be a better Wikipedian and perhaps help if/when I apply for adminship again sometime in the future.

Mahoga ny

My RFA

Hi Mário/archive3,

Thank you for supporting my RFA! Unfortunately it did not succeed mainly because most opposers wanted me to spend more time on Wikipedia. Thank you for your faith in me & looking forward to your continued support in the future.

Cheers

Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 00:58, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nazism

What is revisionism and on what grounds are you calling this proposed name change a revisionism? As I pointed out, in all other encyclopedias preferd term is "National Socialism". -- Vision Thing -- 16:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PCP

Yes, I'm leaning towards the dab being at PCP. I'm not fully committed at this point. Vegaswikian 19:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Catalonia

Thank you for your support. Best regards from Barcelona. --Joan sense nick 22:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your support on my recent RfA. It succeeded with a final tally of 72/2/0 and I am now an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the new tools, but please let me know if there's any adminnery I can help you with in the future. —Wh o uk (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thanks

Mário/archive3, thank you you so much for validating my RfA! I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have taken both the positive and constructive on board. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please let me know, ditto if you see me stumble! Thanks again for your much appreciated support. Deizio talk 18:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sabes, se precisas de ajuda e só dizer! Obrigado, Deizio talk 23:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

União Proletaria

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Proletarian Union" Committee of the Portuguese Marxist-Leninist Communist Organization (in reorganization). --Soman 09:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you

The count is in, and now I join the crew who wield the mops and pails.

Thanks for your support! I pledge to serve both you and Jimbo Wales.

If you have anything you need, then please don't think to hesitate.

For I am the very model of a grateful admin designate!

♫Bucketsofg✐♪

Need your help for Mormonism portal

I´m not registered at wikipedia. So I can not start the creation of the Mormonism portal. Please, start this portal. I will contribute when it is possible for unregistered wikipedians. 84.146.201.207 16:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD article with long name

Don't worry about the slow response, I'm sometimes guilty of the same. As for the article with long name, I'm sorry for initially not clarifying my point. Either way, looks like the article made it out of AfD alive :-). Also, I'm sorry if I was overly chained to google, but I do tend to believe that any topic about a developed nation with few (or no) google results is of questionable notability at best. Anyway, best wishes. Cool3 00:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One suggestion, if you have an account on the Portuguese Wikipedia, you write an article on the same topic there. The other contributors there would probably be more familiar with the topic and maybe their input could help you expand the English article. Secondly, if the Portuguese article survives, it would provide you with a powerful argument in a second AfD, should one occur. Cool3 00:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tone's RfA thanks

Dear Mário/archive3 — Thank you for your support on my recent RfA. It succeeded with a final tally of 46/2/3 so now I am an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the new tools, but please let me know if there's any anything I can help you with in the future. And please correct me, if you spot I make a mistake. Thank you again. --Ton e 23:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

RfA

I notcied that you've left messages for Cool3 on his talk page, so I thought you mihgt want to vote in his RfA at WP:RFA. ShortJason 15:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me now

Can you please start the creation of the Mormonism portal. You can create the portal with the portal box and I will update the articles of this portal. I can help you with the creation when it is allowed for unregistered users. 84.146.213.64 13:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baltar (Paredes)

I am working on this parish as part of my effort to fill in {{Parishes of Paredes}} (which I created.) I'd like you to take a look at it. The Portuguese article doesn't have enough context in it for me to continue translating it. (Starting from "A antiguidade do povoamento de Baltar deve atribuir-se à época romana...") Mainly, I can't really understand the concept of "honra" in this article, and the article for Honra is unrelated (and very strange.) Grand master ka 05:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Mário/archive3, thank you for participating in my RfA. Unfortunately, a great number of oppose voters felt that I lacked experience, and a consensus was not reached (the final tally was 30/28/10). Perhaps I will try again in another few months when I have a few more edits under my belt. If I do, I hope I can count on your support. Thanks again! Cool3 talk 20:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for the trust that you had in me when you supported my Request for Adminship. The nomination ended successfully and I am actually overwhelmed by the support that I received. Thanks again! -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 06:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Mário/archive3, thank you for participating in my RfA. It passed with an amazingly unopposed 77/0/1. Thanks for the support everybody! If you see me doing anything wrong, want to ask me something, or just want to yell in my general direction, leave me a note on my talk page. I promise to try and knock out Wikipedia's problems wherever I may find them!

Staxringold _talk^contribs 21:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Modulation techniques

Hey, thanks for adding stuff to the template. Feel free to do whatever you like with it. I like making templates to organize articles on Wikipedia. --HappyCamper 20:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite Songs

My survey has changed. I am now continuing my mission for the best songs, but now I am accepting all genres. I'm giving you a chance to revote for your top ten favorite songs of any genres (not just classic rock which is still the best). I've made a executive decision to keep the existing survey results and just add on to that with the new entries. My feeling for doing this is because classic rock is the most influential genre in music currently so it should be expressed more in the survey. Thank you for contributing in the past, and hopefully in the future. ROCK ON. RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 03:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Portal:Portugal

I've had some luck listing them on the main WP:PR, but your mileage may vary ;-)

As far as the portal itself, it's very nice, but there are a number of issues I noticed:

The "Selected picture" archive doesn't show the actual pictures (and the descriptions used when they were displayed), as one would expect. Also, convention is to give an image credit (like on WP:POTD) below the image.
The "Did you know" section needs an archive as well as more frequent updates.
The "Categories" section shouldn't include any links that point to pages which don't exist.
The "Maintainers and guestbook" section is too self-referential; it should be moved to the talk page or removed entirely.
There are a number of boxes listing things to do; I would combine the "Things you can do", "Article needed", and "Collaboration" sections into a single box.
There's no need for a "sub-portals" column if there aren't any at the moment.

Overall, though, it's in pretty good shape, and can probably be brought up to featured portal standards fairly easily. Kirill Lokshin 18:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal

Duas coisa:

Excelente trabalho no portal! Não tenho andando muito activo por esses lados, mas de volta e meia lá vou actualizando algumas coisas. Mesmo assim vou tentar ajudar no que puder para torná-lo "featured".
Gostava de pedir a tua ajuda para uma coisa semelhante à que fizemos com a List of Presidents of Portugal. Se quiseres ver, tenho na minha sandbox (User:Joaopais/Sandbox) uma lista de primeiros ministros que tenho vindo a desenvolver, semelhante à dos presidentes, só que com a particularidade de serem 119 (!) em vez de 20... Optei por ignorar toda a informação anterior a 1834, já que não existia o posto de Primeiro Ministro, ou quando existia era esporadicamente. Além disso toda a informação em List of Prime Ministers of Portugal anterior à Monarquia Constitucional parece-me factualmente errada, já que as pessoas mencionadas ocuparam o cargo de Ministro do Reino (o equivalente ao actual Ministro da Administração Interna), um cargo paralelo (e não superior) a outros como Ministro da Guerra e Ministro dos Estranjeiros. Gostava então de pedir a tua ajuda para duas coisas: dares a tua opinião geral revendo a lista (se possível) e corrigindo aquilo que achares pertinente; e ajudares-me a tentar encontrar imagens para os Ministros que faltam e a pensar numa maneira de passar ao lado da malta que acha absolutamente ultrajante que apareça uma imagem de um ministro português que governou durante 12 dias em 1867, sem informação do autor.

Um abraço! Joaopais 21:00, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Narrow Gauge railways in Portugal

Hi. Many thanks for the RfA vote, which is appreciated. I have been very pleasantly surprised by the level of support I've received.

Yes, narrow gauge railways are one of my passions. How wonderful to have grown up that close to one. I am unfortunately woefully ignorant of Portugese railways, I'm afraid. I'd certainly like to learn more about them. In fact its an area that Wikipedia also seems to be lacking coverage in. Perhaps you could help me work on some articles to correct this? It would be a great chance for me to learn more and for us to improve Wikipedia.

Many thanks, and best wishes, Gwernol 21:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of members of the ASEAN

Check out if it already meets your criteria, and what needs to be done in order for it to attain featured status. Thanks. --Howard t he Du c k 14:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project

Hey, you can just create it as you can create any Wiki page, the only problem would be if somebody thinks it isn't a viable project... a Wiki project should attract at least a few members, if you can do that you should be OK... If it's more of a personal crusade you should think hard whether it needs to be formalised as a "project" - if you aren't sure that you can attract more people to join then maybe wait until you can, or at least make sure that similar projects have got off the ground OK... I'll obviously sign up and help where I can. I haven't had as much Wiki time as I once did recently, also my contract is almost up so I'm leaving Porto and heading back to Scotland at the end of this month. I'll still be keeping an eye on Porto affairs but obviously not with the same level of "hands on" knowledge about stuff, eg Porto Metro. Deizio talk 23:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe 's talk 15:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Dear Mário/archive3, thanks so much for your support during my recent successful request for adminship. I really appreciate it. Let me know if you need any administrative support; just leave me a message on my talk page or send me an e-mail if it's urgent. Take care man -- Samir धर्म 05:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear power by country

I've addressed your points at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nuclear power by country/archive1. Thanks for your comments; they've definitely helped improve the list. smurrayinchester^{(User), (Talk)} 22:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DVD+R/W's RfA

Thank you for your support in my RfA, which ended with the result of (74/0/0). If there is anything I can help with feel free to ask. Also, if there is anything I am doing wrong, please point that out as well. I look forward to working with you in the future.

Highest regards, DVD+ R/W 02:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation work

You requested the translation of pt:Onda de violência no Brasil em Maio de 2006 to English. I can do the job. What should I do with your request at WP:TIE? Do you want any special thing from the article? Regards!

I honestly didn't have any particular section in mind. It just appears as though the article on the Portuguese Wikipedia is much longer and more comprehensive than the one on the English Wikipedia. Perhaps you could use your best judgement in determining what information in the Portuguese article would be suitable for improving the one here. Thanks in advance. joturn e r 04:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On June 18, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article João das Regras, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Cactus.man ✍ 09:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

It is not necessary to find consensus to redirect articles. If so, why would such an thing be available to regular users? Non-notability does not always merit deletion, as it can serve as a useful redirect. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 19:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "valuable content" you describe is already discovered in the movie's plot summary. Rat thing from Skull Island bites people. People turn into zombies. Rat thing gets beaten to death. That's already in the plot summary. Making an entirely new sections for a fictional creature on the article is simply redudnancy. And please do not accuse me of redirecting without reason. I am not some vandal. And as I've said, it's a useful redirect. Non-notability does not always merit deletion if the title sill has some use. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 20:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

Thanks for voting!
Hello Mário/archive3, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care.

--Pilot|guy 22:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My (Mtz206) RfA

Thanks for supporting me in my RFA. My Request was successful with 41 supports, 12 opposes and 5 neutrals, and I'll do my best to live up to your expectations. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. -- mtz206 (talk) 02:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lusophobia

See this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lusophobia Page Up 13:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal

Sorry. I saw some edits which , not knowing much about the subject, I could not tell whether they were useful contributions or vandalism( I did not know whether the changes were random garbage, or a serious assesment of the events). I looked at the talk page of the editor, and saw a vandalism warning on it dated today, saying the user vandalised Portugal. I noticed that the content that it said was vandalism had not been removed, so I reverted the edits. I obviously made a mistake.Dolive21 14:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lusophobia

I was amused that some people found nothing on Google to substantiate the claim that the term Lusophobia doesn't exist. As regards the Lusophobia article being POV, other contributors have been far worse than me.

I accept that the term's use in an Australia/East Timor context is tenuous, as nobody in Australia except Geoffrey Hull [1] appears to use it. Portugal-bashing would be more readily understood.

However, in Brazil, the term was definitely in use (see Jeffrey Mosher's “Political Mobilization, Party Ideology, and Lusophobia in Nineteenth-Century Brazil: Pernambuco, 1822 - 1850") and so it's worth retaining the article for that reason alone. Remove the other stuff, but don't delete the article entirely. Quiensabe 11:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Australian ODI cricketers

Hi, I made a few changes to the list after your comment on the featured list candidates thread. Please take a look at it and see whether it fits now. (and congratulations on tonight's 1-0 win.) Sam Vimes 21:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My edits @ Portugal

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. It seems to have happened during an RCP. I always analyse the content of an edit carefully before reverting. I think that it probably happened due to me pressing the backspace during a period of repeated vandalism on a page, as I tend to do about 100 legitimate reverts in every session, this kind of error is possible. As there had been a revert below on the page Portugal I must have thought that this was the page that was under attack, and reverted this by mistake. Thanks again, Sincere Apologies, Abcdefghijklm 15:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rink hockey

Thanks for the compliments. I want to collaborate with Wikipedia and I do at what I know best, which is sports. I really like reading other stuff, but I'm not very keen on writing about it, so I prefer objective stuff.

Keep up the good work you too ;)--Serte 19:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal

Great initiative! i'll try to do an effort, but i'm not very experienced with working with portals. --Soman 16:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is the problem with those links?

(The Portuguese Language - an Ocean of Cultures [2]) (Côa Valley Archaeological Park [3]) (World Heritage Sites in Portugal [4]) São em inglês + são interessantes e instrutivos; Instituto Camões Ministério da Cultura e UNESCO ... José Manuel CH--GE 23:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Ooh! I am touched and humbled, thank you for your lovely comment and the compliment. Thank you again. Page Up 10:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with those links is that we should restrict EL (...) + don't create your own captions, use the website's title.

The name: The Portuguese Language - an Ocean of Cultures is not my creation... is from the second page of the same website; http://www.instituto-camoes.pt/cvc/oceanoculturas/eng/index.html (second page) http://www.instituto-camoes.pt/cvc/english.html (first page)

Sorry I do not believe in your “EL” (Hell?) Best regards, José Manuel CH--GE 13:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Prague Spring

Álvaro Cunhal really suported the communist invasion of Czechoslovakia. I supose you didn´t see recently the programm in RTP Memória channel, about communism in Western Europe, were it appeared excerpts of interviews with Santiago Carrillo and Enrico Berlinguer, and from a intwerview with him, from the 1980`s, were he TOTALLY suported the 1968 invasion, because he believed the Prague Spring was counterrevolucionary. I supose you don´t know very well Cunhal biography in this aspects, because it´s 100 % true. I can even do a quick search about these in his books, and show you soon his own quotations on these. User:Mistico

To do

Olá. Para a caixa "to do" utilizo normalmente as categorias respectivas como tu disseste: procuro nomes em português (apanho muitos brasileiros!). Ás vezes faço um "find" de vogais com acentos ou com til. Algumas em que isso é difícil, esforcei-me por encontrar artigos eu próprio que necessitassem das respectivas correcções. Um abraço! Joaopais 23:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]