User talk:Lysol x

I was going to put a template on your talk page, but then I remembered that it is bad form to template the regulars... which you undoubtedly are. If you are going to make that edit, at least have the integrity to do so with your main account and not some throw away account. You can always try to have the section on his page deleted or you can follow the steps of dispute resolution. AniMate 22:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. nat.utoronto 22:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I don't know who you really are, but I suspect I would have expected better of you. I've permablocked you for harrassment. There's an autoblock, too, which might make life awkward for your real account for a bit. ➔ REDVEЯS is standing in the dark 22:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, lawless Wikipedia Police.Lysol x (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lawless? Wikipedia:Harassment and WP:SPA apply, as you already know. Thanks for the drama, and trying to extend it to me, but, well, really, it's very dull. Have you nothing better to do? ➔ REDVEЯS is standing in the dark 23:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]