User talk:Lynseywales

Speedy deletion of Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Primary Care Trust

A tag has been placed on Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Primary Care Trust, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Primary Care Trust

I have nominated Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Primary Care Trust, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Primary Care Trust. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some improvement work on the page, such as adding sections, doing the references inline properly, correcting some incorrect markup and the like, which gives it the look and feel of a proper article now.

In adding the inline references, I guessed at which references might backup which text. Inline references which directly support each bit of text are favourite! If you want to use the same reference to back-up multiple bits of text, you can add <ref name=PCTAR /> rather than type the whole reference out again.

You already have one external source, which is good, but more would be better (references to online editions of local papers are good).

If I can help, with anything else, just leave a message here. Mayalld (talk) 14:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lynseywales, you seem to have had an exiting day. The founder of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales had a similar problem once, see second item down:http://www.cherryflava.com/cherryflava/cape_town/index.html

I have added a table and a few other bits to the article. Perhaps some of the other editors of the Wikipedia:WikiProject National Health Service may like to hear about this AfD nomination.--Aspro (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation templates

When citing references, it makes for a better formated reference if you use the {{cite web}}template.

use as follows;

<ref name=LET>{{cite web|author=Lancashire Evening Telegraph|title=PCT wins award|url=www.lancashireeveningtelegraph.co.uk/news/story}}</ref>

Hope that helps Mayalld (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like that article! The name Wales must now speak volumes on Wikipedia! Lynseywales (talk) 15:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]