User talk:Lynne from Valentown

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Historic Valentown", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that the user has requested a username change and should not be blocked. Thank you for your responsiveness. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdrqaz: Renamed. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Lynne from Valentown! I noticed your contributions to Valentown Hall and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding a conflict of interest

Hi Lynne from Valentown, Thank you very much for your contributions to the Valentown Hall article. I see that you have received a conflicting request about this – someone apparently asked you to remove content from your user page –, but I'd personally recommend using the user page to neutrally disclose your affiliation with this topic. Of course, your user page should not be used for promotion, but a simple statement such as "I work for / represent X (see also: Valentown Hall) and am aware of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline as well as the policy about paid contribution disclosure" would be beneficial.

There may be some concerns about the use of primary sources in your contributions. If I understand correctly, your content strongly relies on primary sources. This is usually problematic, as described at WP:PSTS – in a nutshell, Wikipedia articles should be built on secondary independent sources. Please also take care not to create a copyright violation: This concern even applies if you have published a text yourself somewhere else before publishing it on Wikipedia.

Ideally, you should probably not edit the Valentown Hall article directly. Others have objected to some of your edits, and you seem to have a conflict of interest, so the next recommended step is having a discussion at the article's talk page (Talk:Valentown Hall). Feel free to invite those who have expressed disagreement to the discussion, by adding a short message on their user talk pages like "Hi, I'd like to invite you to the discussion at Talk:Valentown Hall".

If questions arise, the people at the Teahouse are always there to help.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Valentown Hall

Thank you for your thoughtful and professional message regarding our series of conflicting edits on the article Valentown Hall. I would absolutely like to work with you to update this page rather than against. It is clear to me now that you have a deep and personal understanding of the history of the Valentown area and museum that I overlooked over the past few days. I want to address probably our two greatest points of conflict thus far:

1. Regarding the Grange...

My initial reason for removing this section is because it felt very disconnected from the rest of the article, as the "History" section was not in chronological order. However, based on your message, I have a better understanding of the Grange in the context of Valentown. Perhaps if the "History" section was reorganized in a chronological fashion, the connection between the Grange and Valentown could be better accentuated for the sake of the average reader. I also feel that there is some significant overlap/redundancy between the "History" and "Overview" section, though I recognize that my previous edit perhaps pared it down too much.

2. Regarding paranormal activity...

My edits here were intended to convey that at one point in time, Valentown was a "hotspot" for paranormal research, evidenced by the episode of Fact or Faked that I was familiar with and referenced. Then, my intent was to make it clear that the owners and operators of Valentown have strongly opposed this sort of sentiment, as I currently hold a similar stance towards this phoney ghost-hunting industry. It is clear to me now that my point of distinction did not come across very clearly. I think this subject matter is still significant to include within the article, and that much of the information you included in your message could be repurposed to include, as a historical record of changing perspectives on the Valentown Museum.

I hope some of these thoughts help clear up my perspective, and I hope that we can work together to provide the highest quality article for this establishment that we can. Thank you for your determination and passion for this project. TNstingray (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it might be worthwhile to have more specific conversations on the talk page for Valentown Hall. TNstingray (talk) 21:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your understanding and acceptance, it is so very much appreciated. I would be fine in discussing this on the Valentown Hall talk page if you are inclined that way, so I will follow your lead on that as you are more experienced than I am regards this kind of technical collaboration. The "where" we talk isn't as important to me as "that" we talk. :)

1. Regarding the Grange... I agree there needs to be better organization presenting it. I have struggled with how to present the information elsewhere as well, especially as this will be a primary focus upon this seasons opening of the museum. The actual history of the Nat'l Grange movement isn't even taught anymore in schools, though thousands of Granges are still operational nationally. I confess I probably digressed in attempting to include some background history on what/who/why the Grange was founded in the first place. And since I am, as you say, so personally close to the subject I think it would be beneficial if the material could be presented from a more objective perspective and organized in such a way as to be more sensible to the average reader.

2. Regarding the paranormal activity... I did like in your last edit where you made it clear that the museum had distanced itself from that. The actual "history" of the whole ghost hunter ordeal was actually less than a year in actual events, but the impact of those events have lingered for a decade, though by focusing on the true nature of the property they have faded substantially and continue to. My feeling is that adding actual links to areas that promoted (or continue to promote) encourages the traffic to the museum in pursuit of that aspect. I know this to be true because I have seen first hand museum visitors come into the Hall in pursuit of ghost tours, argue the existence of them with the staff, and leave with no other interest in the property at all. I know for certain it is a "history" that the Victor Historical Society would rather not call attention to.

SO. I'm very open to restructuring the copy and would be interested in how you would do it. Though... how do we share copy idea's without editing the actual wiki page over and over? How do we collaborate "off page"? I'm relatively new to wiki in this context, so likely have missed a lot of development techniques.

Lynne from Valentown (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Victor Grange at Valentown Hall

Hello, Lynne from Valentown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victor Grange at Valentown Hall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Victor Grange at Valentown Hall

Hello, Lynne from Valentown. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Victor Grange at Valentown Hall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry! I completely forgot about this one. Initially I was going to have 2 pages, one for Valentown Hall and then one for the Victor Grange. I ended up getting so wrapped up in edits over the Hall page that by the time that page got settled, I was working on other aspects of the Victor Grange. Thanks for the notification. 50.49.139.187 (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Yellowhouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yellowhouse.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Yellowhouse.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Yellowhouse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a photo that requires a copyright. It is a building on the property of the Victor Historical Society which owns and operates the Historic Valentown Museum located in Victor, New York. The museum and all buildings on the property are publicly viewable and can be photographed from all angles both on and off the property.

Further information: Copyright in architecture in the United States

United States copyright law contains the following provision:

The copyright in an architectural work that has been constructed does not include the right to prevent the making, distributing, or public display of pictures, paintings, photographs, or other pictorial representations of the work, if the building in which the work is embodied is located in or ordinarily visible from a public place.

—

The definition of "architectural work" is a building, which is defined as "humanly habitable structures that are intended to be both permanent and stationary, such as houses and office buildings, and other permanent and stationary structures designed for human occupancy, including but not limited to churches, museums, gazebos, and garden pavilions". Lynne from Valentown (talk) 17:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While the building may not qualify for copyright protection, the author of the photograph will still hold copyright of the image. The current licensing on the file is incorrect as a result. See Commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#Legal status of pictures for more information. Salavat (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Yellowhouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yellowhouse.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Specifically permission from the President of the Board at Historic Valentown museum for the use of their photo. Salavat (talk) 14:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Pickering (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too closely tied to museum articles, and tone is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Unsure whether Pickering merits her own biography or should be covered within the hall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jane Pickering and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 02:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lynne from Valentown! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 02:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. The first woman doctors in any area back when women weren't even allowed to get graduate degrees is probably not very important historically at all, even if she was one of the first National Grange woman secretaries, too. Women just weren't seen as important players outside of the kitchen or nursery back then, and those who made progress to be more than that were rare indeed, and mostly not accepted as valuable community members socially, politically, or otherwise. We've decided that Dr. Pickering is sadly not Wiki worthy, and that she will be better represented with her own dedicated page on the Valentown museum website which represents the New York state area where she would be more accepted as a valid and respected historical figure. This will also be more in line with the coming museums display honoring her in working with the New York State's museum organization MANY to place some focus on the achievements of women and minorities in the historical sense during the 1800's. Thank you for your critiques, I withdraw this submission from consideration by Wiki. Have a good day! Lynne from Valentown (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's unfortunately the challenge of women of a certain era whose lives weren't well documented, although I don't think it's the case that she's necessarily not notable. You have a great start for museum article, which is a different tone to an encyclopedia. You can try to get help through Women in Red if you ultimately do want to pursue it Star Mississippi 00:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your referral, but for now ... we're done trying to get her into Wiki. I have forwarded your suggestion along to A LOT of historical entities who have women of import from the 1800's and early 1900's. Thanks for that referral. 45.53.111.131 (talk) 01:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome, and happy to help any of your colleagues. And I just looked at the Valentown Hall article. I remember that building-I went to college in Pittsford so know Victor quite well. Star Mississippi 01:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small world! So you must have attended St. John Fishers or Nazareth? Both lovely campus's. I've just finished the Pickering page on the Valentown web site, if you're inclined to look. It's not public yet, pending review from the rest of the board. https://historicvalentownmuseum.org/page.php/DrPickering 45.53.111.131 (talk) 01:39, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did indeed, and crazy to think they're both on the cusp of being universities! They were so small when I was there.

Will have a read of that tomorrow. Thanks for sharing the link. Star Mississippi 01:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have a good night, thanks for your attention! :) 45.53.111.131 (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's such a quandry, though... we can't "wiki up" women without "appropriate" documentation, but they didn't document women's achievements back then except in unqualified (by todays standards) documentation authored and approved by men... who had very little use for women with higher goals or were ambitious. 45.53.111.131 (talk) 01:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Yellowhouse.jpg

Hello, Lynne from Valentown. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Yellowhouse.jpg — was tagged with {{permission pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the VRT noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the VRT noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. We gave up on the image. The woman who took it the board of directors permission to use it,but she is not technical and didn't want to reply to wiki on a computer. She gave us a written statement which our board president submitted, but that was not acceptable. So we published the page without the image and instead included an image that was from a newspaper article a few years ago. But then after publishing the whole page was declined because it was determined that Dr. Jane Pickering was not "note worthy" and not deserving to have a wiki page. So we said "To heck with Wiki, it's too much trouble", and we were highly insulted that one of the first female physicians in the 1800's wasn't worthy enough. So we built our OWN wiki-like page for her. AND.. we included the picture of our yellow house. You can see it on our website: https://historicvalentownmuseum.org/page.php/DrPickering

Go ahead and remove the picture of the yellow house. We've since put a new roof on that house anyway, so the picture is no longer current. 45.53.110.107 (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jane Pickering

Hello, Lynne from Valentown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jane Pickering, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jane Pickering

Hello, Lynne from Valentown. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jane Pickering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]