User talk:LyndseyFifield

Speedy deletion nomination of David Hauptmann

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Hauptmann, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Erpert (let's talk about it) 16:16, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:16, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Hauptmann

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as David Hauptmann, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chzz ► 16:27, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You were warned against creating attacks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LyndseyFifield (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason=Please unblock me - I'm new to Wikipedia and meant no harm!

Decline reason:

Which part of your warning did you not understand? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

LyndseyFifield (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am just trying to make a page for my boyfriend's birthday - I didn't realize that was a blockable offense and I did not see my warning until I'd already been blocked.

Accept reason:

OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. We have a policy of assuming good faith. Please don't misuse the article space...and happy birthday to your boyfriend. PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]