User talk:Lyndsayalarice

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nancy Newman, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 21:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Lyndsayalarice. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Nancy Newman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Per this comment which states that you edit on behalf of Newman. bonadea contributions talk 21:20, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Newman

Wikipedia does not publish original research. If content is verified by a reliable source, you can not remove it based on your own beliefs or experiences. Newman's work for CHCH is verified by the Toronto Star and her mother's maiden name is verified by Newman herself in the same article. Please do not remove any more content from the Nancy Newman article unless you can provide a reliable source that contradicts what is written. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lyndsayalarice, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lyndsayalarice! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nancy Newman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nancy Newman. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 01:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Nancy Newman. - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to delete information that has put Nancy Newman's safety at issue. I apologize if that is deemed as disruptive. Lyndsayalarice (talk) 01:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And we are trying to make you stop, without blocking you ! - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are trying to do. But I am trying to assist in keeping a real person safe. I am not trying to be disruptive, but simply delete unnecessary information online that can harm an individual. I would rather come to a compromise about what to put on Nancy Newman's webpage than keep going back and forth with editing. I do not see why including the name she used in Canada must be on her Wikipedia page. It is not currently referenced in her YES Network bio, where she is currently employed. That website can be referenced for accurate information on Nancy Newman. Lyndsayalarice (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You say you are attempting to keep a person "safe". Yet you keep using the edit summary Deleted inaccurate information regarding mother's "maiden name" and beginning of career. What else are you being deceptive about? Jim1138 (talk) 02:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your questions. I will start a talk page for Nancy Newman with my suggested edits. I have found websites that reference where I obtained my information - such as starting her career in Scarborough, not Barrie. Lyndsayalarice (talk) 02:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]