User talk:Lyndis Parlour
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, Lyndis Parlour, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
- Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- How to add those all-important references
- Simplified style guide
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Very kind of you, thanks! --Lyndis Parlour (talk) 20:42, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
 | This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
Civility lesson
[edit]You feel ashamed for me? If that's your attitude to people making sure appropriate wikilinks are retained, you need to grow up before you leave personalised messages again. Your account is a week old, so either you're a rookie who doesn't know that's not cool, or (more likely given your editing behaviour) a SOCK who's not being careful. Kingsif (talk) 07:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- You could just have expained your edit to me, which you did not, instead using rollback. You must be aware that this was not cool in the first place. --Lyndis Parlour (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I openly ask if you are the same person behind the account that created Arsenal Women 2–3 Wolfsburg Women? Kingsif (talk) 08:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, you can, and clearly I am not. I just saw an article that caught my attention, coming from RC. If it's a crime to patrol RC as a newbie, or make links between articles, then that would be very sad. --Lyndis Parlour (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- 1. Noted. 2. You don't need to so emotively defend yourself (that would be very sad) from accusations (a crime to patrol) that were never made: you brought up RC. 3. Speaking of, though, I think it's great when newbies get involved in the deeper parts of Wikipedia, but you must know it's unusual for someone who's been here a week to not only know all the back alleys but also already be using the jargon. I'm not hiding that it's drawn attention to you. Kingsif (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, you can, and clearly I am not. I just saw an article that caught my attention, coming from RC. If it's a crime to patrol RC as a newbie, or make links between articles, then that would be very sad. --Lyndis Parlour (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I openly ask if you are the same person behind the account that created Arsenal Women 2–3 Wolfsburg Women? Kingsif (talk) 08:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think RC belongs to the deeper parts of Wikipedia, and what you mean by back alleys escapes me. I would actually like to understand some of those inner workings you seem to be referring to, but that's not my reason for being here. Look, I'm sorry if linking a new, poorly written article to your masterpiece and vice versa offended you (or whatever it was that aggravated you so). But you should accept that other people are also genuinely trying improve Wikipedia by writing articles on subjects of their interest, or paying some attention to them. Since both articles are about similar subjects, record-breaking women's football matches, you really ought to explain your aversion. --Lyndis Parlour (talk) 05:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also, don't you ever think, for one moment, that your abuse of talk pages for spreading rumours and false accusations against other people is going unnoticed. --Lyndis Parlour (talk) 05:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)