Jump to content

User talk:Lydiajohnson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Lydiajohnson, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Feedback
I really enjoyed your change in approach to this project, you decided to talk about an architect in specfic. I see that you contributed a lot. It appears that there was little to nothing on this architect before you started working on it. You talk about his background at the age of 13, and so on. You also talk about his accomplishments as an architect with his pieces like the Government Palace of Peru in 1938. Overally I beleive that you really buffed out this article and did it a good service. This is all of course backed up by the sources.


Bokddaan (talk) 01:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Overview is the first thing we read. It seems to be good and gives the most important information about the architect. Briefly creates an idea about who he was and his achievements. I do feel satisfied. Although, the part about "love of his life" is not really necessary. Talking about structure, I would divide "Life" by several subdivisions like "early years", "family life", "education", "achievements in architecture". Also, I would add more information to every subdivision because as a reader I want to know more. Seems to me, there is a lot can be added. Nothing is really off-topic. I think the article does not draw conclusion and does not trying to convince me in anything. I have not found any words that would be unnatural. None of claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people were found by me. The article does not really focus neither on positive or negative information. It just reveals some facts from life of an architect. Unfortunately, I didn't find any resources. Neither journals nor textbooks. I am afraid that it could be presented inaccurately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bokddaan (talk • contribs) 07:44, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]