User talk:Luttinger

Welcome!

Hello, Luttinger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Water Extraction from the Atmosphere - new patented technology, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MuffledThud (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Water Extraction from the Atmosphere - new patented technology

A tag has been placed on Water Extraction from the Atmosphere - new patented technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Atmospheric Water Generator. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. GreyWyvern (talk) 14:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know on what basis you make your comment, which is unfounded. Indeed, I ask YOU to adhere to the rules and only employ reliable sources for your assertions.--Luttinger (talk) 20:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Atmospheric Water Generator, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. See also Wikipedia:RSUE GreyWyvern (talk) 00:13, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grey, you are abusing and distorting wikipedia rules. The rule you refer to (Wikipedia:RSUE) only states that "English-language sources are preferable to sources in other languages so that readers can easily verify the content of the article. However, sources in other languages are acceptable where an English equivalent is not available.". You have no grownd to remove this edit, and each time you try yet another trick. I'm escalating this now fo formal dispute resolution.--Luttinger (talk) 15:08, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]