User talk:Lusilier

Hello, Lusilier, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for registering an account.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay.


	Introduction 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help Tips	How to write a great article Manual of Style Be Bold Assume Good faith Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC.
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Welcome aboard!

Welcome - always glad to see geo-knowledgeable new editors. I've tweaked a few of your edits for image sizing and some link fixes. Normal illustrative images should be set to default size (no size given in the image link) as Wiki users can set their preferences for image size. Other images such as diagrams & graphs with text should in general be large enough to make them readable, but not too large to avoid overwhelming the page view. Note that I set my browser at 200x for viewing ease (vision problems plus distance to my screen from my recliner :). Anyway, enjoy editing and feel free to drop me a note if the wiki gets confusing or you hit a rough spot. Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I was just wondering about that. Default setting does make sense (a principle i now remember from HTML programing way back then!). Tx also for your offer to help - I may take you up on it. --Lusilier (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Hi Luilier! I hope you are having a fun time contributing to Wikipedia! I was wondering if you would like to join Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geology to stay in contact with like-minded editors. all the best! --Tobias1984 (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tobias. Thanks very much for the invitation. I appreciate. Interestingly, years ago when I still called myself a structural geologist, I did my graduate work on ice to shed light on rock deformation. In the geological community, ice was considered a rock analogue, even though it is as rock. But my research did not qualify as geo-relevant so I was forced to move into an unusual field where ice did matter and funding was available: offshore engineering in cold regions. My contributions to Wikipedia deal mostly with sea ice and engineering (as opposed to sedimentological/depositional) aspects of the seabed. Although still a geologist at heart, I don't feel I can contribute to any geo-relevant topics. --Lusilier (talk) 14:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do think that we should think of Geology in the broadest sense. It would be helpful to have people like you on board so we can stay flexible enough in topics and opinions. By the way, I have student-assisted a course about brittle and ductile deformation in thin-sections a couple of years. We watched a movie about ice deformation every year, because it can be deformed and filmed at the same time. Really interesting topic. --Tobias1984 (talk) 14:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The movie was probaly Chris Wilson's work (if you remember a thick Australian accent in the commentator's voice...). The processes described take place at relatively low strain rates, more akin to what happens inside glaciers (compared to, say, when floating ice crashes into a bridge pier). The key feature with ice is that it happens to melt at relatively low temperature (0 deg. C), hence no need for a oven to make these observations, just a cold room. I'll have a closer look at your WikiProject. --Lusilier (talk) 15:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's the movie. We compared it to the deformation of quartz-rich rocks. Both minerals have different deformation mechanisms at different temperatures. The movie showed that very nicely. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Submarine pipeline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tension (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Offshore construction may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [Submarine pipeline]]s

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's fixed!

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strudel (ice), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	nice work on the offshore geotechnical engineering page. Perhaps you could add a more prominent link to this new page from the geotechnical engineering, soil mechanics and other offshore related pages? Blkutter (talk) 05:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tx Blkutter. Nice to get some feedback on this. I'll browse around and see if I can add some more links. As for geotechnical engineering, it already has a subsection dedicated to offshore. Lusilier (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lusilier. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ice roads) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ice roads, Lusilier!

Wikipedia editor Zppix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the redirect

To reply, leave a comment on Zppix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 14:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the image

Hi Lusilier, and thank you for this image, which you offered at Snow. I first moved it down lower (it was above the infobox) and then realized that it depicts snowflakes of uniform size and crystal type, which I felt was an over-simplification even for an uninformed reader. Otherwise, I really appreciate the collection of images that you have developed.

I see that you are interested in a lot of cold-regions and snow-related topics and have cited material from my former colleagues at CRREL. That's great stuff! Keep up the good work! I'll watch for any reply, here.

Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 11:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HopsonRoad!

Thanks for your edit. Somehow I know my drawing wasn't going to remain there ;) Yes, it was a bit of an oversimplification (I may have taken it out myself eventually), at least with regards to the article, which is quite academic, i.e. target readership made of educated folks with a college degree, or college students per se.

The purpose of my editing the intro part was to make this article a little more comprehensible for someone, say, in India (where English is an official language), Africa, Far-East, folks young and old that have never experimented a snow fall, or touched the stuff, who are intrigued by it.

I would greatly appreciate your views. What would this drawing have taken away from the article? Would it have lost its 'Good quality' status? Who rates these articles - educated folks (those who need Wikipedia the least)? Who are we writing for? How much of the page view statistics are viewers that didn't bother reading further because it is too complicated? Your answer(s) would help me understand a little better Wikipedia's mission. The last thing I'm interested in is to mess up good Wikipedia material!

Thank you Lusilier (talk) 17:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You pose a good question, Lusilier. When I started to remodel the article, it looked like this. I questioned the quality of the article with Talk:Snow#GA Reassessment and took corrective action. Your concern is whether the article is accessible enough to someone who is not knowledgable on the topic. I feel that the photographic images probably give the best sense of the nature of the stuff. It's hard to convey the experience of watching a snowflake melt or making a snowball. The pre-revision version showed people making snow angels and a giant snowball. I didn't feel that those images were germane to the core content; one doesn't see sand castles at Sand or water skiing at Water.

BTW, some of the world's experts in snow come from Japan, India and China!

As to the drawing, I would have kept it if it showed a variety of crystal types and sizes both in the air and accumulated. Since you have the ability to clone such things, that may be within your technical capability. Such an illustration could also show compaction, metamorphoses, and melting in a series of vertical frames within the image.

As to who rates articles, it's any registered user of Wikipedia, according to standards, which for a good article found at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment.

I hope that this helps. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 19:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, HopsonRoad. The article has gone a long way. It's a arduous task, the predicament of a democratic encyclopedia. A two-edged sword: input from a large number of highly knowledgeable editors on the one hand, managing input from everyone on the other.

I also thought of upgrading the figure. I'd have to research the subject.

Lusilier (talk) 22:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then there's always the Simple English article on Snow. Perhaps that's the place for the easy-access reader. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 02:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I didn't know these existed!

Lusilier (talk) 13:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tip on formatting references

Hi Lusilier, I note that you appreciate good formats for references. You may not have been introduced to Wikipedia:Citation templates, which can neatly do the work for you. I often Google a passage in the More/Books tab, paste the url of the material of interest into the "| url = " entry and then click on "about this book" to get bibliographic information. I copy the information wholesale into the space above the citation template and then cut and paste from there down into the template. It's fast, easy and neat, complete with live links. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 19:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this also, HopsonRoad. I will look at it. Citations are a nuisance but are important (at work I use EndNote).

Lusilier (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lusilier. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lusilier. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ice road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creep. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]