User talk:LusikSnusik

Welcome!

Hello, LusikSnusik!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfD process

Hi,

I was rather surprised by some of your AfD nominations such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyubov Sobol, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Eidelman and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cityline (ISP), all of which where done on the grounds of suspected lack of notability.

Please note that lack of sources referenced in an article doesn't indicate that the subject is non-notable. Editors are required to search for reliable sources WP:BEFORE nominating articles for deletion. You may find Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#Nomination useful to consider other ways to improve articles prior to nominating them for deletion. PaulT2022 (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to make the same observation with regards to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DAM (Palestinian rap group) - it very much feels like this nomination was made largely with respect to the material on page, not with respect to the WP: BEFORE process with should proceed an AfD. Now we've all been there, and it's easy to overlook certain things, but Dam, as an example, has numerous scholarly paper and book hits: it's coverage is fairly prolific. So, please make sure you take on board the feedback from the previous comment and this one and make sure you are doing your due diligence properly before making these nominations. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. gidonb (talk) 15:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]