User talk:Person0000000

June 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jerome Corsi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Read the definition of libel: truth is an absolute defense against claims of libel, at least in the United States. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did give a valid reason in the edit summary: consensus and WP:BLP. And the content in the Jerome Corsi article was false. I will continue to protect such articles from Wikipedians with an agenda like you. Not to mention that my original edit removed no content. It merely softened a clearly biased and libelous characterization that had no consensus. Lunixer (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]