User talk:Lundo

Copyright issue with Nat Finkelstein

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Nat Finkelstein, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.natfinkelstein.com/bio/index.htm. As a copyright violation, Nat Finkelstein appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Nat Finkelstein has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Nat Finkelstein and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Nat Finkelstein with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Nat Finkelstein.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Peninsula so.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Peninsula so.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dual.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dual.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

I note that you say permission has been "granted", however, this is insufficient as you do not say what permission has been granted for. If it is permission for use solely on Wikipedia, this is insufficient as Wikipedia is intended as a resource which can be freely copied. To be included an image has to be released under a free licence such as the GFDL, CC-by or CC-by-SA. Note that all these have the effect of allowing anyone to use the image, including for commercial purposes.

I've tagged the other images in Susan Olmetti similarly. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 16:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the {{nolicense}} tags unless you are able to provide details of the license the images are released under. As I said above, it is not enough to write "Used with permission" or something similar; to be used on Wikipedia (with a few exceptions) an image must have a license which allows anyone to use or modify it freely. Please see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for possible licenses, discuss with the image creators whether they are willing to release their work under such a license, and if so, add an appropriate tag to the image pages. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 10:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Olmetti

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Susan Olmetti, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Susan Olmetti

An article that you have been involved in editing, Susan Olmetti, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Olmetti. Thank you. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 10:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]