User talk:Lunatic, Esquire

Lunatic, Esquire, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lunatic, Esquire! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

FAC

I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the New Coke article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions. --Laser brain (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for editing on a proxy while introducing OSable BLP violations in conjunction with other users.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lunatic, Esquire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never edited a biography of a living person. I do everything with a VPN on. Lunatic, Esquire (talk) 15:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

From WP:BLP "Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. This doesn't mean just biographies. The edits in question were indeed OSable, and the block is warranted. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.