User talk:Lukabeograd
Unless you provide a reference that FIBA accepted pre-breakup Yugoslavia's records to Serbia-Montenegro/Serbia, your edits will continually be reverted. –HTD 15:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Yugoslav sports results
[edit]
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you.
Sports results attained by various representatives of Yugoslavia should be assigned to the eponymous states. For FR Yugoslavia, to which Serbia did become the sole successor, a reasonable case could be made that summary results can be merged. Yet, it's still anachronistic to say that "Serbia" won some medal in 2000 when the old name was used at the time.
It is particularly anachronistic and biased to say something like that for 1950, when there is a widespread consensus that SFR Yugoslavia broke up and that no individual new state was its sole successor. Please review the neutral point of view policy. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
April 2012
[edit] In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.
You have repeated the same behavior I tried to talk to you about six months ago. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Marko Perovic Red Star.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Marko Perovic Red Star.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
December 2012
[edit]You have again assigned results for all "Yugoslavia" to "Serbia" in several sports articles. This would seem to be a violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you have been warned several times in the past. You should already be aware that there is a risk of sanctions arising from continuing to breach policy in this area. Kahastok talk 10:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kahastok talk 15:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
January 2013
[edit]
Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
September 2013
[edit]Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.