User talk:Lujaraga1

Lujaraga1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lujaraga1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Liga Nayarit de Béisbol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to San Blas, Chilapa, Compostela and Santa María del Oro

Ramón Raya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Forward

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing the block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lujaraga1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am accused of being a sockpuppet of another user and that is not true, and I do not consider fair to undo all my contributions that are not vandalism or inappropriate material on the contrary I am helping that some of the pages looks better, or updating info.

Decline reason:

The evidence would seem to indicate otherwise. 331dot (talk) 19:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I acknowledge receiving your email; I do not respond to emails about nonprivate Wikipedia matters. As for the evidence, the sockpuppet investigation is linked to from your userpage, and is viewable by anyone. Your edits were removed because edits by blocked editors are not allowed to stand. You need to get unblocked under your original username if you want your valid edits to stand. If you are not the blocked user, you are free to make another edit request so you can convince another administrator. 331dot (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But as you can see my contributions are beneficial for the encyclopedia, maybe in the past I used to add unsourced material, or created pages incorrectly, but I believe that I can be an active and useful user of Wikipedia, and I don't seem fair, to be banned forever. I have invested a lot of time and work here and I don't think this is the way to threat the proactive users. As I already told you, I don't vandalise or put inappropriate material. If you give me the chance I could create more good contributions. Most of my work is focused on mexican sport leagues, by creating pages of the teams, of the players and uploading images totally copyrighted and updating their respecting info. Please help me to contribute for good. I am open to hear any sugestion about my contributions from other users or administrators. Lujaraga1 (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked "forever"(and you are not "banned", something very different), the block only remains until the issue is resolved. I've indicated how you can proceed. 331dot (talk) 21:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also received an email from this user requesting an unblock. Given they have now admitted sockpuppetry, and are still using IPs to edit, my suggestion to you is to go away for 6 months and then request an unblock from their primary account (Ronalditos58815738) WP:STANDARDOFFER. Giant Snowman 11:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The edits that you undo where proactive, official and sourced, not vandalism or unsourced material, if you are moderators then why you act incongruously and without any criteria. Let's watch if you put the same effort improving, editing, updating, creating pages and uploading logos where are needed, as active as I did. Lujaraga1 (talk)

If you want your valid edits to stand, you need to get unblocked under your original username. A block has little meaning if the blocked editor makes edits anyway. 331dot (talk) 19:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]