User talk:Luigiperali

Welcome!

Hello, Luigiperali, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 10:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comfort (definition) for deletion

The article Comfort (definition) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comfort (definition) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 10:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest, possible spamming

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Your creation of Comfort (definition) and Comfort definition (deleted as a duplicate) both appear to be trying to reference books by Luigi Perali. Your username would indicate that you are the author of the books in question. This gives you a Conflict of Interest when adding books by Luigi Perali to Wikipedia as sources. It could also be seen as spamming. If books by Luigi Perali are to be used to reference articles, then such referencing should be done by editors who are unconnected with the author or publisher of such works. This may mean that there is no such reference on the English language Wikipedia, as the books would appear to be in the Italian language, thus reducing the likelihood that an editor would use them as sources.

Please read the linked pages in the Welcome notice I left at the top of the page, as they will give you a better understanding of what Wikipedia is and is not. Mjroots (talk) 10:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Comfort (definition) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 11:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]