User talk:Luigi1337

hey now, you're a keemstar

Lovely Professional University promo removal!

Why do you keep removing this reference? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reference is acceptable but not the rest of the material. I'm sorry but I've grown tired fending off these editors who keep adding promotional materials. King Kunta (talk) 16:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely Professional University

Per your edit what exactly is the problem? Surely you don't object ranking information, which is very much per consensus? I was opposing the end of the sentence but another editor insists and I don't care enough to oppose. --Muhandes (talk) 13:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, what do you have against this article? This fact is well sourced in the article, infobox and lead don't need to reference facts that are present and well sourced in the article. --Muhandes (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Which other University wiki puts up a 'ranking' by a random magazine? It's just not acceptable for an encyclopedia. King Kunta (talk) 09:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus for universities in India is to add rankings from this magazine. If you want to change the consensus please start discussion at WT:INEI. I may support you if you have a compelling argument.

And, it doesn't explain this. --Muhandes (talk) 10:43, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized, you actually also asked a question. "Which other University wiki puts up a 'ranking' by a random magazine". Here are the first ranked law universities in this ranking, but you can also go down the list. You can also check articles for the other rankings by this magazine. This magazine rankings are used by, in my estimation, 200-300 pages.

--Muhandes (talk) 11:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The articles you've linked provide rankings by multiple sources which is fair. I'd be more than happy to add other rankings from reputed sources. Regarding the infobox date, there's some confusion regarding whether the University actually started classes in 2005 or whether it's admissions office was opened on the mentioned date. King Kunta (talk) 11:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naturally, these are the top four universities, they would have more than one. Look at the bottom ones and you'll find other universities with only one ranking. Here is #17 for instance: South Calcutta Law College. {{Infobox India university ranking}} is used in 300 articles more or less. Each institute includes the rating in which it appeared. There is a strong consensus (both in WP:UNIVERSITY and in WP:INEI) not to mention ratings which don't appear. So if an institute only appears in one rating that's what we have.

As for the 2005, the article says 2005 and uses a reliable source. Again I don't understand your edit, but I'm going to WP:AGF. I do request that you stop reverting my edits with feeble reasons and give me (and other editors) just a little credit. --Muhandes (talk) 17:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tahershahface.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Tahershahface.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. General Ization ^Talk 18:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Luigi1337. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]