User talk:Ludo29

Hi, Ludo29, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.

Additional tips

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only.
You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing. —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian.

Click here to respond to this message!

Question

<moved from Village pump> Excuse me but I'm french, and I don't speak english very well. I don't know if it's the good place for this question. On wiki:fr we have a question. How many town in UK, in England ? Thanks. Ludo29 10:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a difficult question. Although towns in England are distinguished from villages and cities, it is not always clear whether somewhere is a village, a town or a suburb of somewhere else. We have a list of towns in England, which I think has about 800 towns listed, but every now and then somebody adds another one. Warofdreams talk 16:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unitary authorities

Hi - unitary authorities are subdivisions of metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties of England - or in many cases, are counties themselves (see for a list). However, "county" means different things to different people, and Stockton-on-Tees is a unitary authority falling in two ceremonial counties of England.

Metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties are subdivisions of regions, so unitary authorities are also subdivisions of regions.

Hope this helps! Warofdreams talk 02:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Salut,

C'est fr:Milord j'ai un gros problème l'adresse ip de mon université est bloqué et moi aussi avec :( . Si tu pouvais aller débloquer l'adresse ip (regarde ma page de discussion). Aide moi, je t'offrirais un verre sur le bistro si tu m'aide. Je ne suis pour rien dans le blocage de cette ip :S

Merci d'aider un honnête wikipédien fr

Perry Rhodan 07:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC) alias fr:Milord[reply]

Je t'ai répondu, et je signale un petit détail : si je n'avais aps de problème à écrire je n'aurais pas utiliser le terme bloquer lol. merci à toi surper admin (et Mammouth ?) Perry Rhodan 08:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ZENNNNNNNN ca recommence grrrr. Cela m'a rebloquer pourquoi ? au monde cruel . Redemande à Pe et si cela le refais encore une fois je repart chez moi et je me jette ......sur mon lit Perry Rhodan 08:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai compris quand je me suis déconnecter de mon pseudo, j'ai vu que l'utilisateur vandale user:Sallegarce était connecter. Il faut attendre encore pour qu'il se déconnecte du réseau et il faut le bloquer. Lui et pas l'IP sinon moi aussi je me reprendrais à chaque fois le blocage. Perry Rhodan 08:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC) o[reply]

rollback

Hi, as you are a trusted user on French Wikipedia, I have granted you WP:ROLLBACK. Regards, John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ouais!

Bon, je viens d'offrir un chaton à Madame, mais entre hommes rien ne vaut une bonne 'ière. Popo le Chien ^{throw a bone} 17:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Ludovic,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 16, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-12-16. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:41, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thanks for your message. Ludo29 (talk) 07:41, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Liste des utilisateurs qui seront renommés d'office

Bonsoir. Il y a(vait) une page spéciale qui donne cette liste, mais je ne la retrouve plus, tu peux m'aider ? --GaAs (d) 20:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ludo29. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ludo29. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request of unblock

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Hi, I'm mainly contributor on fr.wp. Now I'm block on en.wp because of my IP adress (62.102.224.0/19). I'm not a big contributor on en.wp, but no reason for this block. Can you unblock my account ? Thanks Regards. [[User:Ludo29|Ludo29]] ([[User talk:Ludo29#top|talk]]) 08:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC) | decline = That IP range comes up as belonging to a ADISTA SAS webhost, you will have to use other means to edit. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:29, 13 February 2020 (UTC)}}

@331dot: any reason why not to apply the Wikipedia:IP block exemption? Ludo is a long-time trusted user (he was sysop for ~10 years on fr.wp). Cheers, VIGNERON * ^discut. 12:20, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's my understanding that the user needs to demonstrate an exceptional need as well. 331dot (talk) 14:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how about "Contribute to the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" as a need? Like, it's literally the ~~second~~ first sentence on the front page (right after "Welcome"). Popo le Chien ^{throw a bone} 14:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: where does this « exceptional need » come from? I've never heard of it, it's not documented on Wikipedia:IP block exemption and on Wikipedia_talk:IP_block_exemption/log I can see many user with nothing exceptional (I even see a « Affected by a rangeblock not intended for them. » which is exactly the situation here). Pinging @SQL: who granted a lot of these exemptions (and who blocked this IP range). Cheers, VIGNERON * ^discut. 15:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These types of blocks would mean very little if exemptions to them were handed out to anyone that asked. There are currently only 381 accounts with exemptions. This user is free to ask for an exemption, another administrator will review such a request. 331dot (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:

I've made a request to be unlock. I know that i'm blocked not about my contributions, but just about my IP address. So, Yes, since the beginning i ask to have an exemption.

I make contributions on the wikimedia projects since 15 years. I don't understand the reason of your refusal.

Which ones of my contributions here are a danger for Wikipedia ?

Ludo29 (talk) 17:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say your contributions were dangerous to Wikipedia or anything about your contributions. This only has to do with your IP being a webhost. If you want to ask for an exemption, instructions are given below. 331dot (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Since I was pinged here:
From Wikipedia:IP_block_exemption#Used_for_anonymous_proxy_editing,
An editor who demonstrates a need, and can be trusted not to abuse the right.

It is correct that an exceptional need isn't required, but there must be a demonstrable need to edit via open or anonymizing proxies. With regard to requesting IPBE, the same section even goes on to say (emphasis mine):
Email the checkuser team at checkuser-en-wpwikipedia.org ensuring your email includes your username, or contact a CheckUser directly, explaining why you need to edit via anonymous proxies.

A vast majority of the requests I've granted have been editors from China, Iran, Turkey, and other situations where editing is literally impossible without using a VPN or other anonymizing proxy (which is what that range pretty clearly is, [1], [2]). The rest have been editors affected by checkuser rangeblocks not intended for them.

This isn't a no, but an explanation of the process, and the conditions surrounding IPBE on the English Wikipedia. SQL ^{Query me!} 17:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SQL Apologies, I think my use of "exceptional" gives a stronger meaning than I intended. 331dot (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: The IPBE policy did indeed use the words "exceptional need", but it was softened some time ago.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:@SQL: Ok, I looked it up and I see where the misunderstanding stems from Ludo29's work IP being somehow listed as a proxy on your side, whereas it's just a regular ISP on his (why, I do not know; first time I see such thing). I see here that a couple of IPs within the range are attributed to secondary schools, so yes it can be source for disruptive editing. This being said, frwp have lifted the rangeblock so I don't think there's any reason to think things should be any different here. Popo le Chien ^{throw a bone} 09:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request of unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ludo29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I'm mainly contributor on fr.wp. I'm not abble to work correctly on Wikipedia, because one of IP adress (that I'm not allowed to change) is blocked. Does it possible ti apply an exemption for my account. Thanks Regards. Ludo29 (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.