User talk:LucyBanhPham

Welcome!

Hello, LucyBanhPham, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Euphorbia milii. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 01:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Wikipedia requires that all material added to an article has to be verifiable. Please see the policy at Wikipedia:Verifiability. I have marked your contributions with the tag [citation needed]. - Donald Albury 02:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I caused you any confusion. I just wanted you to be aware that you should be prepared to provide a reliable source for anything you add to an article in Wikipedia. Anything that you add to an article that is not supported by a citation to a reliable source can be challenged and removed by another editor. How likely that is to happen depends on a number of factors, but it is good practice to provide a citation for all quotes, and for anything that might be challenged. For example, commentary on the edibility of parts of a plant not commonly consumed may need a citation. While readers are strongly urged to not rely of Wikipedia, someone may do so, and we want to make sure that everything in Wikipedia is as accurate as possible, and that a reader can verify that accuracy by following up a cited source. Personally, I try to insure that every piece of information that I add to a Wikipedia article has a citation to a reliable source. Not every editor is that fastidious, but it is a good idea to know what reliable source you will be able to cite if an edit is challenged. - Donald Albury 09:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

  Dear Longhair and Donald Albury,
  I am very appreciative of your welcoming me and giving me advice to be more accountable in  contributing, making Wikipedia the most reliable source for everyone. 
  Thank you.
  Best, 
  LucyBanhPham (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! As mentioned in Longhair's post, you can always ask for help if you have any questions. And don't worry about getting everything perfect at first. Other users will happily help fix any technical glitches. Good luck and happy editing. - Donald Albury 17:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Epiphyllum

Hi, there's a difference between the genus Epiphyllum and the group of hybrids and cultivars called "epiphyllums" which have an article at Epiphyllum hybrid. I think your addition based on a gardening book really applies to the latter, but it's not a book I have so I can't check. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About My add on Epiphyllum

 Dear Petercoxhead,
 It is true that Epiphyllum hybrid is where my add should be. 
 Thanks for your keen eyes. 
 Best, 
 LucyBanhPham (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Favor to Ask

 Dear Longhair and Donald Albury,
 I just wonder if you could have some minutes to read my article " A Way to Help" and tell me if I need to make any edits. 
 Thank you so much.
 LucyBanhPham (talk) 20:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Way to Help

The article A Way to Help has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Refs in the article are were just gibberish links. I added the only source I could fine, but that is not enough to support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 20:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advice Needed

  I just remove the links in the reference section, please advice what else needed to do to make this article not to be removed. 
  Thank you. 
  LucyBanhPham (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help Needed

  Dear Insertcleverphrasehere,
  I just made some changes to my article by removing all the links in reference.
  When you have time, could you please read " Away to Help" one more time and give me advice about what else needed to be done?
  Thank you so much. 
  LucyBanhPham (talk) 23:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A Way to Help for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Way to Help is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Way to Help until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 11:34, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]