Jump to content

User talk:LuckyandLucky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Japanese invasions of Korea

[edit]

Hey, about your recent edits, they are true except that they were worded weirdly. (Wikimachine 21:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sockpuppet?

[edit]

Honestly, User:LuckyandLucky and User:Necmate are the same person when one compares the exact same edits they made to Korea under Japanese rule. diff diff. Also, Necmate stopped editing on March 26th, and LuckyandLucky created their account on March 27th. Anyway, whoever you are, please don't make sockpuppet accounts. oncamera(t) 21:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, User talk:Oncamera and User:EvolutionaryCreationist are the same person when one compares the exact same edits they made to Korea under Japanese rule. diff - [1]LuckyandLucky 22:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do believe those edits are different if you look in the article's history. These are the correct links: diff, that's your sourced edit which came after my revert of unsourced material, and these are the combined edits User:EvolutionaryCreationist made diff, which were merely copy-editing. The edits are not the same. oncamera(t) 22:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is the act of returning it based on information that the South Korean deleted prohibited? (To produce a poor South Korean, some South Koreans satanically write Japan. ) --LuckyandLucky 22:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If the information has a source, then it can be included as long as it is in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. Your edit and Necmate edit had no source. oncamera(t) 22:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems very likely that this is the same user as User:Necmate, but Necmate is not blocked or banned so it isn't a block/ban-evading sockpuppet, nor does he seem to have used it to break the 3RR. Since he's stopped using the Necmate account, there is nothing explicitly wrong with making a new account, as far as I can see. Although he is still an extremely problematic and disruptive user who is yet to make a single useful edit, and I'd very much like to see him/her banned. Mackan 08:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Necmate has come back from his slumber so disregard what I said. Keep an eye on this one. Mackan 17:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]