User talk:Luchnikov

The article Violin memory has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 21:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Violin memory

A tag has been placed on Violin memory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Toddstreat1 02:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Violin Memory

Hi and thank you for your note. I deleted the article as it did not really assert notability WP:CSD#A7 and looked like a promotion or advert for the product WP:CSD#G11 although mostly because there was no real assertion of notability. I also note that it was previously deleted as not notable. On balance I'm not inclined to restore it at this time. However you could certainly recreate the article in your user space, with reliable thirdy party sources indicating why the company / product is notable. I'd then be happy to review it. Alternatively if you disagree strongly you are more than entitled to take it to Deletion Review for a wider debate. Pedro : Chat 13:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]