User talk:Lucepapoose

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Sjakkalle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Defecation, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Defecation was changed by Lucepapoose (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95861 on 2011-12-15T17:42:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

hi soo cute

Mc donnals bag (talk) 17:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dear Mc Donalds Bag, i have been blocked by Sjakkalle. I need a new account i will not be Lucepapoose anymore. i will be under a new id. --Lucepapoose (talk) 18:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

evening Lucepapoose (talk) 18:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block Apeal

Sjakkalle, I confess to a sockpuppeterry case in the past, but why did you block Mc Donnals? she is innocent. If you wish to keep her under a block that is fine but please tell me/her wy she is blocked. Thankyou, --Lucepapoose (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

cat

Lucepapoose (talk) 19:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucepapoose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, I Won't do it again. Lucepapoose (talk) 16:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no reason to believe you Jac16888 ^Talk 17:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucepapoose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because,i want to make respectful and meaningful edits to wikipedia. Lucepapoose (talk) 17:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If that was your intent, then you would have started that way instead of what looks like Facebook-type crap, possible multiple accounts, and giving yourself silly awards. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucepapoose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, at least set an expiry date, im serious i want to be a good faith editor. Lucepapoose (talk) 17:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.