User talk:Lucajeter

Lucajeter, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lucajeter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm Justeditingtoday. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Billy Idol without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Justeditingtoday (talk) 01:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Billy Idol, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 01:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on my talk page

Though I am not User:Justeditingtoday, and you did start your message with "Hi Justeditingtoday!", I do know Justeditingtoday. I've reviewed your edits to the page in question, and you were engaged in an edit war with another user. I'll post the edit warring template below. Also, you just deleted the notice that says on it that someone isn't to add any instruments without consensus first, which you did not achieve. Please bring the discussion to the talk page, then make the edit. And since you were engaged in an edit war, please have another user, who can validate the consensus, make the edit adding the instruments. Thanks, _{Adotchar| reply here} 01:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Billy Idol. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. _{Adotchar| reply here} 01:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your comments on my talk page

You said that "Wikipedia" says that you're doing something wrong. There is no "Wikipedia" standing behind your back watching your every move. There's just editors like me who donate our free time to making sure vandals like you have their vandal edits removed immediately. I know this may seem a bit bitey, but you have engaged in edit warring over something discussed in a Wikipedia guideline. We use consensus, not just going freely about and changing important things. Please consult the talk page and ask about it, before doing this. Thanks, _{Adotchar| reply here} 02:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Lindsey Graham. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:-Users-Luca.Gajovich-Protich-Desktop-71787 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:-Users-Luca.Gajovich-Protich-Desktop-71787 l.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Randy Bachman, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 15:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He was listed as a Stratocaster user.

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at AC/DC. - Mlpearc (open channel) 13:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brian May. Unexplained removal of content Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 17:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2018 Arizona Cardinals season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sam Rosen

2018 Minnesota Vikings season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sam Rosen

2018 Washington Redskins season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Davis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2018 Atlanta Falcons season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Davis

2018 Washington Redskins season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Davis

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2018 Chicago Bears season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Parry

2018 Minnesota Vikings season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Parry

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2018 Carolina Panthers season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Davis

2018 Seattle Seahawks season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Davis

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2018 Arizona Cardinals season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Davis

2018 Los Angeles Rams season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Davis

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POV vandalism at The Gateway Pundit

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Gateway Pundit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

-- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]