User talk:Ltpltp

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Img_guldhedensik_logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Img_guldhedensik_logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MER-C 12:13, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phetogo Molawa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phetogo Molawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phetogo Molawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lindholmsdockan

The article Lindholmsdockan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no external links, I think it falls under CSD but i'm not 100% on that and I don't want to look like an idiot again at AfD so PROD seems like a compromise.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 12:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]