User talk:Lpereira74

A tag has been placed on Pay per chat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fan-1967 22:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your assertions

So you're doing an article about an advertising term that is only used by one site, but claim you're not promoting that site. Right.

A term only used by one site is a Neologism and not Notable. Fan-1967 22:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neologisms

Per Wikipedia policy: Avoid Neologisms. If a term is so new that only one enterprise is using it, and it shows no signs of widespread usage, it does not yet merit an article. It may, at some point in the future, if, and only if the concept and the term gain widespread usage. That time has clearly not yet come. Fan-1967 22:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 23:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The term par per chat is directly related to online advertising in the local search space. An industry that clearly you do not understand. Terms and concepts such as pay per click, pay per call, and pay per post are also Neologism and not Notable to most people on planet Earth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpereira74 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC).

There's a big difference

Usage of the terms, based on Goggle searches:

Pay-per click: Very widely used: Over 3 million Google search results

Pay-per call: Quite widely used: Almost 900,000 Google search results

Pay-per post: Quite widely used: Almost 400,000 Google search results

Pay-per chat: Minimally used: Less than 2,000 Google search results

These are huge differences. Clearly the first three are established as widely used, notable terms. Yours is not. Fan-1967 23:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is Google God? Are we going to start defining the relevance of human terms based on google search results? Have you heard of Search Engine Optimization? ( Lpereira74 23:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC) )[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AskPoodle.com logo askpoodle.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:AskPoodle.com logo askpoodle.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]