User talk:Lovinqxcherry

ummm hi

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Positions (album) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Positions (album) was changed by Lovinqxcherry (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2021-02-23T04:41:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Folklore (Taylor Swift album). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

don't look at me ur the one who started it by disrespecting THE taylor swift for god sakes Lovinqxcherry (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN thread, per your request

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User_is_consistently_edit-warring_and_seems_disinterested_in_consensus_in_principle ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"per your request" suree go ahead... Lovinqxcherry (talk) 04:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 04:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lovinqxcherry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

these 2 grown men are trying to silence a MINOR on an encyclopedia and i believe that it's not fair to everyone here for male privilege to exist on here

Decline reason:

Per below, and this isn't a reason to unblock you, in any event. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:42, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, I'm not a grown man and I'll tell you that you have to follow the rules, no matter what your age is. It's not "male privilege" to ask you not to edit-war. I would retract this unblock request because as long as you are insulting other editors, you will never be unblocked. And if you continue to rage on, you will lose talk page access. So, take some time away from the project and if you would like to continue editing here, refer to the Guide to Appealing Blocks. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

they didn't ask me anything actually, if they would have asked me not to i wouldn't have. also what's ur definition of rage? cause on google it says rage is violent, uncontrollable anger. i was never violent and i was never angry. maybe it was uncontrollable but i wasn't the one controlling it. also i would like to mention that i did the same thing to lover and no one caused a commotion on that page, but when i do it to folklore everyone gets upset? i thought wikipedia users are expected to collaborate with others? that doesn't seem so collaborative to me. xoxo Lovinqxcherry (talk) 07:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok im gonna log off now but before i go i want to give a huge thank u to the 3 grown men who tried to silence me and got their way because of male privilege. another thank u to liz for being a fake feminist. and one more thank u to my twitter followers who are going to cancel ya'll right after i post this to my twitter. ban me all you want but i ain't going away fuckers. this is my town and this is my place to shine. see ya!! lovinqxberry (talk) 08:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]